Modeling and on-line recognition of PD signal buried in excessive noise

Signal Processing

Volumn 84, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2389-2401

  Shetty, Pradeep Kumar ^a   Srikanth, R ^a   Ramu, T S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Boot strap; Non parametric model; Parametric model; PPCA; Smooth fir filter; Wavelet

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL INTERFERENCE; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

BOOT-STRAP; NON-PARAMETRIC MODEL; PARAMETRIC MODEL; SMOOTH FIR FILTER;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 5744253158     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2004.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. H. Borsi, E. Gockenbach, U. Schichler, PD measurements under noisy conditions-possibilities and limits of digital noise rejection, Eighth ISH, Yokohama, Japan, 1993, paper 60.05, pp. 17-20.
2. H. Borsi, M. Hartje, New methods to reduce disturbance influence on on-site PD' measurement and monitoring, Sixth ISH, New-Orleans, USA, 1989, paper 15.10.
3. G.L. Bretthorst, Bayesian interpolation and deconvolution, The U.S Army Missile Command (1992), Technical Report CR-RD-AS-92-4.
4. D.L. Donoho, I.M. Johnstone, Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1995, 1200-1224.
5. K. Feser, G. Konig, J. Ott, P. Setiz, An adaptive filter algorithm for on-site partial discharge measurements, IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Boston, USA, 1988, pp. 242-245.
6. P. Flandrin, Wavelet analysis and synthesis of fractional Brownian motion, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 38 (2) (1992) 910-917.
7. M.H. Hayes, Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modelling, Wiley, New York, 1996, pp. 445-447 (Chapter 8).
8. S.M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing-Estimation Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998, pp. 157-214, 309-415 (Chapter 7, 10-12).
9. U. Koff, K. Feser, Rejection of narrow band noise and repetitive pulses in on-site PD measurements, IEEE Trans. DEI 2 (1995) 1180-1191.
10. F.H. Kreuger, Partial Discharge Detection in High Voltage Equipment, Butterworths, London, 1989 ISBN 0-408-020636.
11. S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, New York, 1999, pp. 220-265, 435-466 (Chapter 7, 10).
12. O. Marrelec, H. Benali, P. Ciuciu, J. Poline, Bayesian estimation of haemodynamic response function ' in functional MRI, CP617, Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy methods in Science and Engineering: 21st International Workshop, 2002, pp. 229-247.
13. M. Massanori, T. Okana, S. Nishimpto, I. Kitani, Study on application of wavelet analysis for degradation diagnostics of PD in a void, IEEE Fifth International Conference on Conduction & Breakdown in Dielectrics, UK, 1995, pp. 371-375.
14. V. Nagesh, B.I. Gururaj, Evaluation of digital filter for rejecting DSI in on-site PD measurements, IEEE Trans. EI 28 (1993) 73-84.
15. L. Satish, B. Nazneen, Wavelet denoising of PD signals buried in excessive noise and interference, IEEE Trans. DEI 10 (2) (April 2003) 354-367.
16. I. Shim, J. Soraghan, W.H. Siew, A noise reduction technique for on-line detection and location of PD in HV cable networks, Measure. Sci. Technol. 11 (2000) 1708-1713.
17. G.C. Stone, Practical techniques to measure PD in operating equipment, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Properties and Application of Dielectric Materials, Tokyo, Japan, 1991, pp. 1-17.
18. M.E. Tipping, C.M. Bishop, A hierarchical latent variable model for data visualization, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(3) (1998) 25-35, 281-293.
19. H. Wang, K. Tan, D. Zhu, Extraction of PD using wavelet transform, ICPDAM, Seoul, Korea, 1997, pp. 322-325.
20. G.W. Wornell, A Karhunen-Loeve-like expansion for 1/f processes via wavelets, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 36 (July 1990) 859-861.