Bringing balance and technical accuracy to reporting odds ratios and the results of logistic regression analyses

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1-6

  Osborne, Jason W ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349190449     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Burton, R. F. (2001) Quantifying the effects of chance in multiple choice and true/false tests: item selection and guessing of answers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol 26(1) 41-50.
2. Cohen, M. P. (2000). "Note on the Odds Ratio and the Probability Ratio." Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25(2): 249-252.
3. Davies, H. T. O., I. K. Crombie, et al. (1998). "When can odds ratios mislead?" British Medical Journal 316: 989-991.
4. Davis, L. J. and K. P. Offord (1997). "Logistic Regression." Journal of Personality Assessment 68(3): 497-507.
5. Holcomb, W. L., Jr., T. Chaiworapongsa, et al. (2001). "An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio." Obstetrics and Gynecology 84(4): 685-688.
6. Pedhazur, E. (1997). Multiple Regression in behavioral research. New York, Harcourt Brace College Publishers: 714-765.
7. Peng, C. J., K. Lee, L., et al. (2002). "An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting." The Journal of Educational Research 96(1): 3-14.
8. Zhang, J. and K. Yu (1998). "What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes." Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 1690-1.