Competitions and dynamics of duopoly wireless service providers in dynamic spectrum market

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc)

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 313-322

  Jia, Juncheng ^a   Zhang, Qian ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Dynamic spectrum access; Dynamic spectrum market; Nash equilibrium; Non cooperative 2 stage game; Wireless service provider

Indexed keywords

AD HOC NETWORKS; COMPETITION; GAME THEORY; MARKETING; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

DYNAMIC SPECTRUM ACCESS; DYNAMIC SPECTRUM MARKET; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; NON-COOPERATIVE 2-STAGE GAME; WIRELESS SERVICE PROVIDER;

WIRELESS NETWORKS;

EID: 57349182167     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1374618.1374660     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. T. Börgers and C. Dustmann. Strange Bids: Bidding Behaviour in the United Kingdom's Third Generation Spectrum Auction. Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2001.
2. D. Cliapin and D. Lehr. The Path to Market Success for Dynamic Spectrum Access Technology, IEEE Communications Magazine, 45(5):96, 2007.
3. P. Dubey. Inefficiency of Nash Equilibria. Mathematics of Operations Research, 11(1):1-8, 1986.
4. D. Fudenberg and D. Levine. The Theory of Learning in Games. MIT Press, 1998.
5. S. Gandhi, C. Buragohain, L. Cao, H. Zheng, and S. Suri. A General Framework for Wireless Spectrum Auctions. IEEE DySPAN 2007, pages 22-33, 2007.
6. V. Grimm, F. Riedel, and E. Wolfstetter. Low price equilibrium in multi-unit auctions: the GSM spectrum auction in Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(10):1557-1569, 2003.
7. S. Haykin. Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2):201-220, 2005.
8. O. Ileri, D. Samardzija, T. Sizer, and N. Mandayam. Demand responsive pricing and competitive spectrum allocation via a spectrum server. IEEE DySPAN 2005, pages 194-202, 2005.
9. H. Inaltekin, T. Wexler, and S. Wicker. A Duopoly-Pricing Game for Wireless IP Services. IEEE SECON 2007, pages 600-609, 2007.
10. D. Kreps and J. Scheinkman. Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Cournot Oligopoly: Characterization and Applications, 1988.
11. H. Lin, M. Chatterjee, S. Das, and K. Basu. ARC: an integrated admission and rate control framework for CDMA data networks based on non-cooperative games. Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pages 326-338, 2003.
12. J. Mitola III. Cognitive Radio for Flexible Mobile Multimedia Communications. Mobile Networks and Applications, 6(5):435-441, 2001.
13. D. Niyato and E. Hossain. A Game-Theoretic Approach to Competitive Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE WCNC 2007, pages 16-20, 2007.
14. C. Papadimitriou. Algorithms, games, and the internet. Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 749-753, 2001.
15. S. Sengupta, M. Chatterjee, and S. Ganguly. An Economic Framework for Spectrum Allocation and Service Pricing with Competitive Wireless Service Providers. IEEE DySPAN 2007, pages 89-98, 2007.
16. A. Shaked and J. Sutton. Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(1):3-13, 1982.
17. M. Short. Spectrum supply and demand - space oddity. http://www. ingenia.org.uk/ingenia/articles.aspx?Index=78, 2000.
18. N. Singh and X. Vives. Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4):546-554, 1984.
19. G. Staple and K. Werbach. The End of Spectrum Scarcity. IEEE Spectrum, 41(3):48-52, 2004.
20. Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, and C. Cordeiro. Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(3):613-621, 2007.