Stigma and its assessment methods

Pacific Rim Property Research Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 126-140

  Chan, Nelson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australian and overseas methods; Evaluation criteria; Quantifying stigma; Stigma

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349176785     PISSN: 14445921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14445921.2001.11104100     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Australian Property Institute (API), 1999, Guide Note 15, Professional Practice 2000, pp. 183-205.
2. Baum, A. & Crosby, N., 1989, Property Investment Appraisal, Routledge London.
3. Bond, S., 2000, Do Market Perceptions Affect Market Prices? A Case Study of a Remediated Contaminated Site, Research paper presented at the 16 American Real Estate Society Conference, Santa Barbara, California, 29 March-1 April.
4. Chalmers, J. & Jackson, T., 1996, Risk Factors in the Appraisal of Contaminated Property, The Appraisal Journal, 65 (1), pp.44-58.
5. Chalmers, J. & Roehr, S., 1993, Issues in the Valuation of Contaminated Property, The Appraisal Journal, 61 (1), pp.28-41.
6. Chan, N., 2000, How Australian Appraisers Assess Contaminated Land, The Appraisal Journal, 68 (4), pp.432-440.
7. Clarke, G., 1998, Director of McGees National Property Consultants, (Interview, August 1998).
8. Dotzour, M., 1997, Groundwater Contamination and Residential Property Values, The Appraisal Journal, 65 (3), pp.279-285.
9. Dybvig, L., 1992, Contaminated Real Estate Implications for real estate appraisers, The Research And Development Fund, Appraisal Institute Of Canada (AIC).
10. Freudenburg, W., 1988, Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science And The Art Of Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Science, 242, pp.44-49.
11. Greenberg, M. & Huges, J., 1993, Impact of Hazardous Wastes Sites on Property Value and Land Use: Tax Assessors’ Appraisal, The Appraisal Journal, 61, (1), pp.42-51.
12. Guntermann, K., 1995, Sanitary Landfills, Stigma and Industrial Land Values, Journal of Real Estate Research, 10 (5), pp.531-542.
13. th American Real Estate Society Annual Meeting in Tampa, Florida, 7-10 April.
14. Lentz, G. & Tse, K., 1995, An Option Pricing Approach to the Valuation of Real Estate contaminated with Hazardous Materials, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10 (2), pp. 121-144.
15. McLean, D. & Mundy, B. 1998, The Addition of Contingent Valuation and Conjoint Analysis to The Required Body of Knowledge for the Estimation of Environmental Damages, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 1 (1), pp .1-19.
16. Mundy, B., 1992a, Stigma and Value, The Appraisal Journal, 60 (1), pp.7-13.
17. Mundy, B., 1992b, The Impact of Hazardous Materials on Property Value, The Appraisal Journal, 60 (2), pp.155-162.
18. Mundy, B., 1992c, The Impact of Hazardous Materials on Property Value: Revisited, The Appraisal Journal, 60 (4), pp.463-471.
19. Neustein, R. & Bell, R. 1998, Diminishing Diminution: A Trend in Environmental Stigma, Environmental Claims Journal, 11 (1), pp.47-59.
20. Patchin, P., 1988, Valuation of Contaminated Properties, The Appraisal Journal, 66 (1), pp.7-16.
21. Patchin, P., 1991, Contaminated Properties-Stigma Revisited, The Appraisal Journal, 59 (2), pp. 167-172.
22. Patchin, P., 1994, Contaminated Properties and the Sales Comparison Approach, The Appraisal Journal, 62 (3), pp.402-09.
23. Reichert, A., 1997, Impact of a Toxic Waste Superfund Site on Property Values, The Appraisal Journal, 65 (4), pp.381-392.
24. Roddewig, R., 1996, Stigma, Environmental Risk and Property Value: 10 Critical Inquiries, The Appraisal Journal, 64 (4), pp.375-387.
25. Roddewig, R., 2000, Adjusting Environmental Case Study Comparables by Using an Environmental Risk Scoring System, The Appraisal Journal, 68 (4), pp.371-374.
26. Sanders, M., 1996, Post-Repair Diminution in Value from Geotechnical Problems, The Appraisal Journal, 64 (1), pp.59-66.
27. Spencer, J., 1993, Standard for Valuation of Contaminated Land in Australia, The Valuer And Land Economist, 32 (8), pp.585-587.
28. Syms, P., 1996a, Dealing with Contaminated Assets, Estates Gazette, Issue 9612, pp. 124-125.
29. Syms, P., 1996b, The Valuation of Contaminated Land: the Problems Caused by Lack of Accessible Data in the United Kingdom, Journal of Property Development, 1 (1), pp. 17-25.
30. Syms, P., 1997a, Perceptions of Risk in the Valuation of Contaminated Land, Journal of Property Valuation & Investment, 15 (1), pp.27-39.
31. Syms, P., 1997b, Contaminated Land, Blackwell Science.
32. Weber, B., 1997, The Valuation of Contaminated Land, Journal of Real Estate Research, 14 (3), pp.379-398.
33. Wilson, A., 1992, Environmentally Impaired Valuation: A Team Approach To a Balance Sheet Presentation, Technical Report: Measuring the Effects of Hazardous Materials Contamination on Real Estate Values: Techniques and Applications, Appraisal Institute, pp.23-42.
34. Wilson, A., 1994, The Environmental Opinion: Basis for an Impaired Value Opinion, The Appraisal Journal, 62 (3), pp.410-423.
35. Wiltshaw, D., 1996, An Economic Analysis of Contaminated Land, Remediation and Liability, Journal of Property Research, 13, pp.131-141.