Effect of electron doping the metamagnet Sr3-y Lay Ru2 O7

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 18, 2008, Pages

  Farrell, J ^a   Perry, R S ^b   Rost, A ^a   Mercure, J F ^a   Kikugawa, N ^c   Grigera, S A ^a   Mackenzie, A P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349163134     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.180409     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. S.-I. Ikeda, Y. Maeno, S. Nakatsuji, M. Kosaka, and Y. Uwatoko, Phys. Rev. B 62, R6089 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R6089
2. R. S. Perry, L. M. Galvin, S. A. Grigera, L. Capogna, A. J. Schofield, A. P. Mackenzie, M. Chiao, S. R. Julian, S. Ikeda, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Maeno, and C. Pfleiderer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2661 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2661
3. S. A. Grigera, R. S. Perry, A. J. Schofield, M. Chiao, S. R. Julian, G. G. Lonzarich, S. I. Ikeda, Y. Maeno, A. J. Millis, and A. P. Mackenzie, Science 294, 329 (2001). 10.1126/science.1063539
4. S. A. Grigera, R. A. Borzi, A. P. Mackenzie, S. R. Julian, R. S. Perry, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B 67, 214427 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.214427
5. Z. X. Zhou, S. McCall, C. S. Alexander, J. E. Crow, P. Schlottmann, A. Bianchi, C. Capan, R. Movshovich, K. H. Kim, M. Jaime, N. Harrison, M. K. Haas, R. J. Cava, and G. Cao, Phys. Rev. B 69, 140409 (R) (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.69. 140409
6. K. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, R. S. Perry, T. Tayama, T. Sakakibara, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127001 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.127001
7. P. Gegenwart, F. Weickert, M. Garst, R. S. Perry, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136402 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.136402
8. F. Ronning, R. W. Hill, M. Sutherland, D. G. Hawthorn, M. A. Tanatar, J. Paglione, L. Taillefer, M. J. Graf, R. S. Perry, Y. Maeno, and A. P. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 067005 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067005
9. A. J. Millis, A. J. Schofield, G. G. Lonzarich, and S. A. Grigera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 217204 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.217204
10. Y. B. Kim and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B 67, 085102 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.085102
11. B. Binz and M. Sigrist, Europhys. Lett. 65, 816 (2004). 10.1209/epl/i2003-10127-x
12. R. S. Perry, K. Kitagawa, S. A. Grigera, R. A. Borzi, A. P. Mackenzie, K. Ishida, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 166602 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 92.166602
13. S. Grigera, P. Gegenwart, R. Borzi, F. Weickert, A. Schofield, R. Perry, T. Tayama, T. Sakakibara, Y. Maeno, and A. Mackenzie, Science 306, 1154 (2004). 10.1126/science.1104306
14. A. G. Green, S. A. Grigera, R. A. Borzi, A. P. Mackenzie, R. S. Perry, and B. D. Simons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 086402 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 086402
15. K. B. Cooper, M. P. Lilly, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. B 65, 241313 (R) (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.241313
16. W. Pan, R. R. Du, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 820 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 83.820
17. S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Nature (London) 393, 550 (1998). 10.1038/31177
18. C. Honerkamp, Phys. Rev. B 72, 115103 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.115103
19. H. Doh, Y. B. Kim, and K. H. Ahn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 126407 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.126407
20. H. Doh and H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 75, 233102 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.233102
21. H. Yamase, Phys. Rev. B 76, 155117 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.155117
22. H. Yamase and A. A. Katanin, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 073706 (2007). 10.1143/JPSJ.76.073706
23. C. Puetter, H. Doh, and H. Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 76, 235112 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.235112
24. E. P. Wohlfarth and P. Rhodes, Philos. Mag. 7, 1817 (1962). 10.1080/14786436208213848
25. K. Iwaya, S. Satow, T. Hanaguri, N. Shannon, Y. Yoshida, S. I. Ikeda, J. P. He, Y. Kaneko, Y. Tokura, T. Yamada, and H. Takagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 057208 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.057208
26. A. Tamai, M. P. Allan, J. F. Mercure, W. Meevasana, R. Dunkel, D. H. Lu, R. S. Perry, A. P. Mackenzie, D. J. Singh, Z.-X. Shen, and F. Baumberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026407 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.026407
27. J. Hooper, M. H. Fang, M. Zhou, D. Fobes, N. Dang, Z. Q. Mao, C. M. Feng, Z. A. Xu, M. H. Yu, C. J. OConnor, G. J. Xu, N. Andersen, and M. Salamon, Phys. Rev. B 75, 060403 (R) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.060403
28. J. Farrell, Ph.D. thesis, University of St Andrews, 2008.
29. G. Cao, S. C. McCall, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Phys. Rev. B 56, 5387 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.5387
30. N. Kikugawa, A. P. Mackenzie, C. Bergemann, R. A. Borzi, S. A. Grigera, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B 70, 060508 (R) (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.060508
31. K. M. Shen, N. Kikugawa, C. Bergemann, L. Balicas, F. Baumberger, W. Meevasana, N. J. C. Ingle, Y. Maeno, Z.-X. Shen, and A. P. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 187001 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.187001
32. Although it cannot be guaranteed that even the La3+ / Sr2+ substitution has a simple effect in a system as close to a quantum critical point as Sr3 Ru2 O7, the result on Sr2 RuO4 is striking because the substitution tuned the material through a van Hove singularity, another situation in which a strong susceptibility to secondary effects is likely. None were observed, increasing confidence in the fact that straightforward carrier doping is the dominant consequence of adding La3+ ions to the Sr site.
33. R. S. Perry and Y. Maeno, J. Cryst. Growth 271, 134 (2004). 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.07.082
34. G. Cao, L. Balicas, W. H. Song, Y. P. Sun, Y. Xin, V. A. Bondarenko, J. W. Brill, S. Parkin, and X. N. Lin, Phys. Rev. B 68, 174409 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.174409
35. V. Durairaj, S. Chikara, X. N. Lin, A. Douglass, G. Cao, P. Schlottmann, E. S. Choi, and R. P. Guertin, Phys. Rev. B 73, 214414 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.214414
36. Assuming linearized dispersions in the vicinity of the Fermi level, A=2π kF ΔE/vF, where kF and vF are the average Fermi vector and velocity of the sheet concerned and is Planck's constant. Our maximum doping corresponds to 0.03 electrons per Ru. De Haas van Alphen (Ref.) and photoemission (Ref.) studies show a number of closed pockets with { kF } and { vF } = (0.24,0.36,0.18,0.07,0.09) Å-1 and (4.0,4.0,2.6,1.3,1.3) ms-1, respectively. Taking into account corresponding "pocket degeneracies" (i.e., the number of repeats in the Brillouin zone) of (1, 1, 4, 2, 2) (Ref.), applying the procedure outlined in the text, gives ΔE 1.2 meV for y=0.06.
37. L. Capogna, A. P. Mackenzie, R. S. Perry, S. A. Grigera, L. M. Galvin, P. Raychaudhuri, A. J. Schofield, C. S. Alexander, G. Cao, S. R. Julian, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076602 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.076602
38. R. A. Borzi, S. A. Grigera, R. S. Perry, N. Kikugawa, K. Kitagawa, Y. Maeno, and A. P. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 216403 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.216403
39. A rigid-band shift through the ARPES-deduced DOS reported in Ref. would suffer from this inconsistency. If the results of Ref. are used to deduce the DOS the contrast with our data is even more striking since that would predict a rise in γ over the relevant energy range.
40. V. T. Rajan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 308 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.308
41. S. A. Carter, B. Batlogg, R. J. Cava, J. J. Krajewski, W. F. Peck, and L. W. Rupp, Phys. Rev. B 51, 17184 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.17184