Comparaison des résultats de l'automate lris IQ elite® á l'examen cytologique de l'urine et évaluation des performances de l'automate pour la prédiction de l' infection de l'infection urinaire;Comparison of IRIS IQ ELITE® and microscopy for urinalysis and evaluation of performance in predicting outcome of urine cultures

Annales de Biologie Clinique

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 555-559

  Ledru, S ^a   Canonne, J P ^a  

^a Centre Hospitalier de LENS   (France)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Urinary tract infection; Urine cell analyser

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BACTERIURIA; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CYTOLOGY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; INFANT; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEWBORN; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINALYSIS; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATION; BACTERIURIA; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MICROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; URINALYSIS; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS; URINE;

EID: 57349160851     PISSN: 00033898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1684/abc.2008.0267     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kouri T, Fogazzi G, Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W, Guder WG. European urinalysis guidelines. ECLM-European urinalysis group. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000; 60(Suppl.): 231.
2. TM pour la prédiction de l'infection urinaire. Rev Fr Lab 2001; 338: 75-81.
3. Okada H, Sakai Y, Miyazaki S, Arakawa S, Hamagushi Y, Kami-dono S. Detection of significant bacteriuria by automated urinalysis using flow cytometry. J Clin Micwbiol 2000; 38: 2870-2.
4. Zaman Z, Roggeman S, Vaerhaegen J. Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 4169-71.
5. Aspevall O, Hallander H, Gant V, Kouri T. European guidelines for urinalysis: a collaborative document produced by European clinical microbiologists and clinical chemists under ECLM (European Confederation for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases). Clin Microbiol Infection 2001; 7: 173-8.
6. Evans R, Davidson MM, Sim LRW, Hay AJ. Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 661-2.
7. Kim SY, Kim YJ, Hwang SH, Kim HH, Son HC, Lee E. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyser as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128: 922-5.
8. TM Sysmex. Ann Biol Clin 2004; 62: 671-80.
9. TM). Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36: 909-17.
10. Hannemen-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture). Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37: 753-64.
11. Langlois MR, Delanghe JR, Steyaert SR, Everaert KC, De Buyzerz ML. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 118-22.
12. Lun A, Zoebog R, Priem F, Filler G. Routine workflow for use of urine strip and urine cytometer UF-100 in the hospital laboratory. Clin Chem 2001;45: 1305-7.