QSAR models for reproductive toxicity and endocrine disruption in regulatory use - A preliminary investigation

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 19, Issue 7-8, 2008, Pages 631-641

  Jensen, G E ^a   Niemela J R ^a   Wedebye, E B ^a   Nikolov, N G ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Advisory classifications; Endocrine disruption; QSAR; Reproductive toxicity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MAMMALS; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; TOXICITY;

ADVISORY CLASSIFICATION; CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION; EUROPEAN UNION; LETHAL EFFECTS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP MODELING; REGISTRATION EVALUATION AND AUTHORIZATION OF CHEMICALS; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITIES; TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; RODENTIA;

EID: 57349150654     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10629360802550473     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Commission of the European Communities, Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, Off. J. Eur. Union. 50 (2007), pp. 1-281.
2. European Commission, White Paper - Strategy for a future chemicals policy, COM 88 final, Brussels, 2001.
3. F. Pedersen, J. de Bruijn, S. Munn, and K. van Leeuwen, Assessment of Additional Testing Needs Under REACH, Effects of (Q)SARs, Risk Based Testing and Voluntary Industry Initiatives, European Commission, Brussels, Protection Directorate General JRC Joint Research Center, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, 2003.
4. Danish Environmental Agency. Report on the Advisory list for self classification of dangerous substances. Environmental Project No. 636, 2001.
5. Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967, COUNCIL DIRECTIVE (EC) No 1488/94 of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances, Off. J. Eur. Union. P196 (1967), pp. 1-98.
6. R. Allanou, B. Hansen and Y. van der Bilt, Public availability of data on EU high production volume chemicals. EUR 18996 EN, 1999.
7. OECD, Draft Guidance document on reproductive toxicity testing and assessment Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 43, OECD, 2004.
8. U. Hass, B.M. Jakobsen, N.P. Brandorff, J.E. Jelnes, and S.H. Petersen, Reproduktionsskadende kemiske stoffer i arbejdsmiljøet. Rapport No. 35, Arbejdstilsynet, Arbejdsmiljøinstituttet. Denmark, 1991.
9. G. Klopman, MultiCASE. 1. A hierarchical computer automated structure evaluation program, Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 11 (1992), pp. 799-805.
10. M. Ghanooni, D.R. Mattison, Y.P. Zhang, O.T. Macina, H.S. Rosenkranz, and G. Klopman, Structural determinants associated with risk of human developmental toxicity Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 176 (1997), pp. 799-805.
11. S. Green, A. Auletta, J. Fabricant, R. Kapp, M. Manandhar, C-J. Sheu, J. Springer, and B. Whitfield, Current status of bioassays in genetic toxicology - The dominant lethal assay. Part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox, Program. Mut. Res. 154 (1985), pp. 49-67.
12. W.R. Lee, S. Abrahamson, R. Valencia, E.S. von Halle, F.E. Würgler, and S. Zimmering, The sex-linked recessive lethal test for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program, Mut. Res. 123 (1983), pp. 183-279.
13. METI, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. Appendix 1 & 2. Data list of RBA values of human ER α receptor binding assay, RA and PC 50 values of human ER α reporter gene assay, in 6th Meeting of the Task Force on Endocrine Disrupters to be held in Tokyo, Japan, 24 and 25 June 2002, pp. 1-23 and 1-4.
14. A.M. Vinggaard, J.R. Niemelä, E.B. Wedebye, and G.E. Jensen, Screening of 397 chemicals and development of a QSAR model for androgen receptor antagonism, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 21 (2008), pp. 813-823.
15. J.J. Kraker, D.M. Hawkins, S.C. Basak, R. Natarajan, and D. Mills, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling of juvenile hormone activity: Comparison of validation procedures, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 87 (2007), pp. 33-42.
16. A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20 (2002), pp. 269-276.
17. R. Benigni and C. Bossa, Predictivity of QSAR, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008), pp. 971-980.
18. Miljø- og Energiministeriet, Miljøstyrelsen. Vejledning fra Miljøstyrelsen. Klassificering m.v. af kemiske stoffer og produkter. No. 6, 1995.
19. Miljøministeriet, Miljøstyrelsen. Bekendtgørelse nr. 329 af 16. maj 2002. Bekendtgørelse om klassificering, emballering, mærkning, salg og opbevaring af kemiske stoffer og produkter, 2002.
20. H. Koëter, Thought starter paper: Framework for the testing and assessment of endocrine disrupters. Task Force on Endocrine Disrupters Testing and Assessment (EDTA) of the Test Guidelines Programme, in 6th Meeting of the Task Force on Endocrine Disrupters to be held in Tokyo, Japan, 24 and 25 June 2000, pp. 1-12.