|
Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 29-31
|
A case against something that is not the case: The Groningen protocol and the moral principle of non-maleficence
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
BENEFICENCE;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
CONGENITAL DISORDER;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
MENTAL STRESS;
MORALITY;
NETHERLANDS;
NEWBORN;
PAIN;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PATIENT CARE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SHORT SURVEY;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
BENEFICENCE;
CLINICAL PROTOCOLS;
CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
NETHERLANDS;
PAIN;
PATIENT CARE TEAM;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 57349145903
PISSN: 15265161
EISSN: 15360075
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802521039 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (9)
|