Position-independent interaction for large high-resolution displays

MCCSIS 2007 - IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems - Proceedings of Intelligent Systems and Agents 2007, Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2007, Computer Graphics and Visualization 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 117-125

  König, Werner A ^a   Bieg, Hans Joachim ^a   Schmidt, Toni ^a   Reiterer, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; High resolution display; Input device; Interaction technique; Laserpointer; Usability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MAMMALS;

COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; HIGH RESOLUTION DISPLAY; IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE; INTERACTION SPEED; INTUITIVE INTERACTION; JITTER COMPENSATION; PRECISE TRACKING; USERS' MOBILITY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 57349141143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ahlborn B. A. et al, 2005. A practical system for laser pointer interaction on large displays. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Monterey, USA, pp. 106-109.
2. Cavens D. et al, 2002. Interacting with the big screen: pointers to ponder. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, USA, pp. 678-679.
3. Chen X. and Davis J., 2001. LumiPoint: Multi-User Laser-Based Interaction on Large Tiled Displays. Technical Report, Stanford University.
4. Douglas S. A. et al, 1999. Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, pp. 215-222.
5. Fitts P. M., 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. In Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 381-391.
6. Fitts P. M. and Peterson J. R., 1964. Information capacity of discrete motor responses. In Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 103-112.
7. ISO 9241-9, 2000. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, International Organisation for Standardisation.
8. Kirstein C. and Müller H., 1998. Interaction with a Projection Screen Using a Camera-tracked Laser Pointer. Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on MultiMedia Modeling, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp. 191-192.
9. MacKenzie I. S., 1991. Fitts' law as a performance model in human-computer interaction. Doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto.
10. MacKenzie I. S. and Jusoh S., 2001. An evaluation of two input devices for remote pointing. Proceedings of the Eighth IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, Heidelberg, pp. 235-249.
11. MacKenzie I. S. and Ware C., 1993. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 488-493.
12. Myers B. A. et al, 2002. Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, USA, pp. 33-40.
13. Oh J. and Stürzlinger W., 2002. Laser pointers as collaborative pointing devices. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2002, pp. 141-149.
14. Olsen D. R. Jr. and Nielsen T., 2001. Laser pointer interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, USA, pp. 17-22.
15. Peck C. H., 2001. Useful parameters for the design of laser pointer interaction techniques. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, USA, pp. 461-462.
16. Soukoreff R. W. and MacKenzie I. S., 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. In International Journal of Computer Studies, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 751-789.