On the semantics of trust and caching in the Semantic Web

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5318 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 533-549

  Schenk, Simon ^a  

^a University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY;

DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION SOURCES; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING; MULTIPLE DATA SOURCES; OUTDATED INFORMATION; WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE; WELL FOUNDED SEMANTICS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 57349135342     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_34     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Liang, B., et al.: Semantic Similarity Based Ontology Cache. In: Zhou, X., Li, J., Shen, H.T., Kitsuregawa, M., Zhang, Y. (eds.) APWeb 2006. LNCS, vol. 3841, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
2. Berners-Lee, T.: Semantic Web Road Map [2008-05-12] (1998), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html
3. Fitting, M.: Fixpoint Semantics for Logic Programming - A Survey. Theoretical Computer Science 278(1-2) (2002)
4. Deschrijver, G., et al.: A Bilattice-based Framework for Handling Graded Truth and Imprecision. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 15(1) (2007)
5. Ginsberg, M.L.: Multivalued Logics: A Uniform Approach to Inference in Artificial Intelligence. Computational Intelligence 4(3) (1992)
6. Golbeck, J.: Trust on the World Wide Web: A Survey. Web Science 1(2), 131-197 (2006)
7. Golbeck, J., Halaschek-Wiener, C.: Trust-Based Revision for Expressive Web Syndication. Logic and Computation (to appear. 2008)
8. Grau, B.C., Motik, B.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Model-Theoretic Semantics [2008-05] (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-semantics/
9. Hitzler, P., Wendt, M.: A uniform approach to logic programming semantics. TPLP 5(1-2) (2005)
10. Kaplunova, A., Kaya, A., Möller, R.: Experiences with load balancing and caching for semantic web applications. In: Proc. of DL Workshop (2006)
11. Katz, Y., Golbeck, J.: Social Network-based Trust in Prioritized Default Logic. In: Proc. of AAAI (2006)
12. Haase, P., et al.: A Framework for Handling Inconsistency in Changing Ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729. Springer. Heidelberg (2005)
13. Polleres, A.: From SPARQL to rules (and back). In: Proc. of WWW (2007)
14. Przymusinski, T.C.: The Well-Founded Semantics Coincides with the Three-Valued Stable Semantics. Fundamenta Informaticae 13(4) (1990)
15. Gavriloaie, R., et al.: No Registration Needed: How to use Declarative Policies and Negotiation to Access Sensitive Resources on the Semantic Web. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
16. Schenk, S., Staab, S.: Networked Graphs: A Declarative Mechanism for SPARQL Rules, SPARQL Views and RDF Data Integration on the Web. In: Proc. of WWW (2008)
17. Stollberg, M., Hepp, M., Hoffmann, J.: A Caching Mechanism for Semantic Web Service Discovery. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
18. Straccia, U.: A Fuzzy Description Logic for the Semantic Web. In: Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
19. van Gelder, A., Ross, K., Schlipf, J.S.: The Well-Founded Semantics for General Logic Programs. J. of the ACM 38(3) (1991)