Life, death, and harm: Staying within the boundaries of nonmaleficence

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 31-32

  Woien, Sandra ^a  

^a REGIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE EUTHANASIA; BENEFICENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONGENITAL DISORDER; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; MENTAL STRESS; MORALITY; NEWBORN; PAIN; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIOECONOMICS; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;

BENEFICENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; DECISION MAKING; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PAIN; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VALUE OF LIFE; WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;

EID: 57349127959     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802513176     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories. June 11, 1980. Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division One. 106 Cal. App. 3d 811; 165 Cal. Rptr. 477; 1980 Cal. App. Lexis 1919.
2. Feldman, F. 2004. Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Jotkowitz, A., Glick, S., and Gesundheit, B. 2008. A case against justified non-voluntary active euthanasia. American Journal of Bioethics 8(11): 23-26.
4. Manninen, B. A. 2006. A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: Exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 643-651.
5. Manninen, B. A. 2008. Revisiting justified nonvoluntary euthanasia: Manninen's reply to Jotkowitz, Glick and Gesundheit. American Journal of Bioethics 8(11): 33-35.
6. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press.
7. Verhagen, E., and Sauer, P. J. J. 2005. The Groningen Protocol - Euthanasia in severely ill newborns. New England Journal of Medicine 352(10): 959-962.