The best available technology for small electroplating plants applying analytical hierarchy process

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 479-484

  Dabaghian, M R ^a   Hashemi, S H ^b   Ebadi, T ^a   Maknoon, R ^a  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Chemical precipitation; Heavy metals; Ion exchange; Nano filtration; Reverse osmosis

Indexed keywords

ELECTROPLATING; ION EXCHANGE; NANOFILTRATION; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); REVERSE OSMOSIS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

DECISION MAKING; HEAVY METAL; ION EXCHANGE; OSMOSIS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER;

ASIA; EURASIA; IRAN; MIDDLE EAST; TEHRAN;

EID: 57349127231     PISSN: 17351472     EISSN: 17352630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03326044     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arieh, D. B., (2005). Sensitivity of multi-criteria decision making to linguistic quantifiers and aggregation means. Comput. Ind. Eng., 48, 289-309.
2. Beynon, M. J.; Curry, B.; Morgan, P. H., (2000). The dempster-shafer theory of evidence: An alternative approach to multi criteria decision modeling. Omega. 28 (1), 37-50.
3. Che-Wei, C.; Cheng-Ru, W.; Chin-Tsai, L.; Huang-Chu, C., (2007). An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Comput. Ind. Eng., 52 (2), 296-307.
4. Cheng, S.; Wang, R., (2004). Analyzing hazard potential of typhoon damage by applying grey analytic hierarchy process. Nat. Hazards, 33 (1), 77-103.
5. Davis, D. H., (1996). Group decision making and quantitative judgments: a consensus model, in: E. Witte, J.H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour consensual action by small groups, Vol. 1, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 35-59.
6. Dryden, J. B., (2005), A decision model to optimize the hydrologic cycle of high performance buildings in Florida. PhD Thesis, Florida University.
7. Ellis, K. V.; Tang, S. L., (1991). Wastewater treatment optimization model for developing world. I: Model development. J. Environ. Eng-ASCE, 117 (4), 501-581.
8. Ellis, K. V.; Tang, S. L., (1994). Wastewater treatment optimization model for development world. II: Model testing. J. Environ. Eng-ASCE, 120 (3), 610-624.
9. Evenson, D. E.; Orlob, G. T.; Monser, J. R., (1969). Preliminary selection of waste treatment systems. J. Water Pollut. Cont. F., 41 (11), 1845-1858.
10. Guangming, Z.; Ru, J.; Guohe, H.; Min, X.; Jianbing, L., (2007). Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 82 (2) 250-259.
11. Gupta, M. C., (1995). Environmental management and its impact on the operations function. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., 15 (8), 34-51.
12. Handfield, R.; Steven, V.; Walton, R. S.; Steven, A. M., (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141 (1), 70-87.
13. Huang, G. H.; Baetz, B. W.; Patry, G. G., (1996). A grey hop, skip and jump approach: generating alternatives for expansion planning of waste management facilities. J. Civil Eng., 23, 1207-1219.
14. Huynh, V. A.; Nakamori, Y., (2005). A satisfactory-oriented approach to multi-expert decision-making with linguistic assessments, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part B., 35, 184-196.
15. Keeny, R. L.; Raiffa, H., (1993). Decision making with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. Mendenhall, W.; Beaver, R.; Reinmuth, J. E., (1986). Statistics for management and economics. PWS-Kent Pub Co.
17. Millet, I., Saaty, T. L., (2000). On the relativity of relative measures-accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 121 (1), 205-12.
18. Peniwati, K., (2007). Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods. Math. Comput. Model., 46 (7-8) 935-947.
19. nd. Ed. University of Texas, Arlington, USA, CRC Press.
20. Rossman, L. A., (1980). Synthesis of waste treatment systems by implicit enumeration. J. Water Pollut. Control F., 52 (1), 147-160.
21. Saaty, T. L., (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol., 15 (3), 234-281.
22. Saaty, T. L., (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
23. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to mark a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48 (1), 9-26.
24. Tsagarakis, K. P.; Mara, D. D.; Angelakis, A. N., (2003). Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems, Water Air Soil Pollut., 142 (1-4), 187-210.
25. Tsagarakis, K. P.; Mara, D. D.; Horn, N. J.; Angelakis, A. N., (2001). Institutional status and structure of wastewater quality management in Greece, Water Policy, 3 (1), 81-99.
26. Tsiporkova, E.; Boeva, V., (2006). Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment. Inform. Science. 176 (12): 2673-2697.
27. USEPA, (1975). Guide to the selection of cost-effective wastewater treatment systems.
28. USEPA, (1993). Development document for the proposed effluent limitation guidelines and standards. EPA, Office of Water, EPA-821-R-93-019.
29. USEPA, (2002). Development document for the proposed effluent limitation guidelines and standards. EPA, Office of Water, EPA-821-B-01-007.
30. Vargas, L. G., (1982). Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients, J. Math. Model., 3 (1), 69-81.