On the use of resubmissions in automatic assessment systems

Computer Science Education

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 229-240

  Karavirta, Ville ^a   Korhonen, Ari ^a   Malmi, Lauri ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349123023     PISSN: 08993408     EISSN: 17445175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08993400600912426     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ala-Mutka, K., Automatic assessment tools in learning and teaching programming, Institute of Software Systems, Tampere University of Technology 2005a, Doctoral Dissertation (Tampere University of Technology, Publication 559)
2. Ala-Mutka, K., 2005b. A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 15: 83–102.
3. Ben-Ari, M., 2001. Constructivism in computer science education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20 (1): 45–73.
4. Carter, J., English, J., Ala-Mutka, K., Dick, M., Fone, W., Fuller, U., and Sheard, J., 2003. ITICSE Working Group Report: How shall we assess this?. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35: 107–123.
5. English, J., and Siviter, P., Experience with an automatically assessed course. Proceedings of the 5th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'00. Helsinki, Finland. New York: ACM Press.
6. Felder, R. M., and Silverman, L. K., 1988. Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78: 674–681.
7. Forsythe, G. E., and Wirth, N., 1965. Automatic grading programs. Communications of the ACM, 8: 275–278. 0001-0782, ACM Press http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/364914.364937
8. Hertz, J., Krogh, A., and Palmer, R. G., 1991. Introduction to the theory of neural computation, Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
9. Karavirta, V., Korhonen, A., and Malmi, L., Different learners need different resubmission policies in automatic assessment systems. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Finnish/Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education. November. pp. 95–102. University of Joensuu.
10. Korhonen, A., and Malmi, L., Algorithm simulation with automatic assessment. Proceedings of the 5th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'00. Helsinki, Finland. New York: ACM Press. http://www.cs.hut.fi/Research/SVG/publications/algo_simu_with_auto_assessment.pdf
11. Korhonen, A., Malmi, L., Myllyselkä, P., and Scheinin, P., Does it make a difference if students exercise on the web or in the classroom?. Proceedings of the 7th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'02. Aarhus, Denmark. pp. 121–124. New York: ACM Press. http://www.cs.hut.fi/Research/SVG/publications/web_or_classroom.pdf
12. Korhonen, A., Malmi, L., Nikander, J., and Tenhunen, P., 2003. Interaction and feedback in automatically assessed algorithm simulation exercises. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2: 241–255. http://www.cs.hut.fi/Research/SVG/publications/interaction&feedback_in_aaas_exercises.pdf
13. Laakso, M. -J., Salakoski, T., and Korhonen, A., 2005. “ The feasibility of automatic assessment and feedback ”. In Proceedings of Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2005) 113–122.
14. Luck, M., and Joy, M., 1999. A secure on-line submission system. Software – Practice and Experience, 29: 721–740.
15. Malmi, L., Karavirta, V., Korhonen, A., and Nikander, J., (forthcoming). Experiences on automatically assessed algorithm simulation exercises with different resubmission policies. Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, Accepted for publication
16. Malmi, L., Karavirta, V., Korhonen, A., Nikander, J., Seppälä, O., and Silvasti, P., 2004. Visual algorithm simulation exercise system with automatic assessment: TRAKLA2. Informatics in Education, 3 (2): 267–288.
17. Mitrovic, A., Martin, M., and Mayo, M., 2000. Using evaluation to shape ITS design: results and experiences with SQL-tutor. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12: 243–279.
18. Naur, P., 1964. Automatic grading of students' ALGOL programming. BIT 4,: 177–188.
19. Rees, M. J., 1982. Automatic assessment aids for pascal programs. SIGPLAN Notices, 17: 33–42.
20. Saikkonen, R., Malmi, L., and Korhonen, A., Fully automatic assessment of programming exercises. Proceedings of The 6th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'01. Canterbury, UK. pp. 133–136. New York: ACM Press.
21. Tscherter, V., Lamprecht, R., and Nievergelt, J., Exorciser: Automatic generation and interactive grading of exercises in the theory of computation. Fourth International Conference on New Educational Environments. pp. 47–50.