An empirical study of software developers' management of dependencies and changes

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 241-250

  De Souza, Cleidson R B ^a   Redmiles, David F ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

^b Ringgold Standard Institution Informatics   (United States)

Author keywords

Change impact analysis; Collaborative software development; Empirical studies; Socio technical aspects

Indexed keywords

CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS; COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; SOCIO-TECHNICAL ASPECTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; SOCIOTECHNICAL ASPECTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPER;

GROUPWARE; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 57349119886     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1368088.1368122     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bohner, S.A. and Arnold, R.S. Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.
2. Ren, X., Shah, F., Tip, F., Ryder, B.G. and Chesley, O., Chianti: A Tool for Change Impact Analysis of Java Programs, in Object-Oriented Programming Languages and Applications, (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2004), ACM Press, 432-448.
3. Ren, X., Ryder, B.G., Stoerzer, M. and Tip, F., Chianti: A Change Impact Analysis Tool for Java Programs, in International Conference on Software Engineering, (St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2005), ACM Press, 664-665.
4. Rothermel, G. and Harrold, M.J. A safe, efficient regression testing selection technique. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6 (2). 1997. 173-210.
5. Orso, A., Apiwattanapong, T., Law, J., Rothermel, G. and Harrold, M.J., An empirical comparison of dynamic impact analysis algorithms, in International Conference on Software Engineering, (Edinburgh, Scotland, 2004), ACM Press, 491-500.
6. Bennett, K.H. and Rajlich, V.T., Software Maintenance and Evolution: A Roadmap. in Future of Software Engineering Track - International Conference on Software Engineering, (Limerick, Ireland, 2000), ACM Press, 75-87.
7. Staudenmayer, N.A. Managing Multiple Interdependencies in Large Scale Software Development Projects Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997.
8. Grinter, R.E. Recomposition: Coordinating a Web of Software Dependencies. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(3). 1998. 297-327.
9. Grinter, R. Supporting Articulation Work Using Configuration Management Systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5 (4). 447-465.
10. Jorgensen, D.L. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1989.
11. McCracken, G. The Long Interview. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1988.
12. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.
13. de Souza, C.R.B., Redmiles, D.F. and Dourish, P., "Breaking the Code", Moving between Private and Public Work in Collaborative Software Development, in International Conference on Supporting Group Work, (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2003), 105-114.
14. Gamma, E., Helm, R, Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995.
15. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F. and Lorensen, W. Object Oriented Modeling and Design. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991.
16. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P. and Stal, M. Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. Wiley, UK, 1996.
17. de Souza, C.R.B., Redmiles, D., Cheng, L.-T., Millen, D. and Patterson, J., Sometimes You Need to See Through Walls - A Field Study of Application Programming Interfaces, in Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, (2004), ACM Press, 63-71.
18. Grinter, R.E., Recomposition: Putting It All Back Together Again, in Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (Seattle, WA, USA, 1998), 393-402.
19. Coulon, A. Ethnomethodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995.
20. de Souza, C.R.B. On the Relationship between Software Dependencies and Coordination: Field Studies and Tool Support Department of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 2005, 186.
21. Perry, D.E., and, H.P.S. and Votta, L.G. Parallel Changes in Large-Scale Software Development: An Observational Case Study. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 10 (3). 2001. 308-337.
22. Sarma, A., Noroozi, Z. and van der Hoek, A., Palantir: Raising Awareness among Configuration Management Workspaces, in Twenty-fifth International Conference on Software Engineering, (Portland, Oregon, 2003), 444-453.
23. Sarma, A., Bortis, G. and Hoek, A.v.d. Towards supporting awareness of indirect conflicts across software configuration management workspaces Proceedings of the twenty-second IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007.
24. Murphy, G., Notkin, D. and Sullivan, K., Software Reflexion Models: Bridging the Gap Between Source and High-Level Models, in Third ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, (New York, NY, USA, 1995), ACM Press, 18-28.
25. Dourish, P. Implications for Design. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, Montreal, Canada, 2006.