A further note on the validity of Weinberg's differential rule

Twin Research and Human Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 596-

  James, William H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDITY; WEINBERGS DIFFERENTIAL RULE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SEX FACTORS; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 57349113114     PISSN: 18324274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/twin.11.6.596     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Edwards, A. W. F. (1958). An analysis of Geissler's data on the human sex ratio. Annals of Human Genetics, 23, 6-15.
2. Fellman, J., & Eriksson, A. W. (2007). Weinberg's Differential Rule reconsidered. Human Biology, 78, 253-275.
3. James, W. H. (1975). Sex ratio and sex composition of the existing sibs. Annals of Human Genetics, 38, 371-378.
4. James, W. H. (2007). The validity of Weinberg's Differential Rule. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 771-772.
5. Pickles, A. R., Crouchley, R. & Davies, R. B. (1982). New methods for the analysis of sex ratio independent of the effects of family limitation. Annals of Human Genetics, 46, 75-81.
6. Weatherburn, C. E. (1949). A first course in mathematical statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Weinberg, W. (1901). Beitrage zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Mehrlingsgeburten beim Menschen. Pflugers Arch. Ges. Physiol. 88, 346-430.