Implicit geometric constraint detection in freehand sketches using relative shape histogram

Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling 2007 - ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 107-114

  Pu, J ^a   Ramani, K ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC IDEAS; FREEHAND SKETCHES; GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS; GEOMETRIC PRIMITIVES; STATISTICAL APPROACHES;

EID: 57349111849     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1384429.1384453     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. LI Y.: Incremental sketch understanding for intention extraction in sketch-based user interfaces. CS Technical Report, University of California, Berkeley (October 2003). UCB//CSD-03-1284.
2. FORBUS K., LOCKWOOD K., KLENK M., TOMAI E., USHER J.: Open-domain sketch understanding: the nuSketch approach. In Proc. AAAI Fall Symposium on Making Pen-based Interaction Intelligent and Natural (2004), pp. 58-63.
3. STAHOVICH T. F.: Segmentation of pen strokes using pen speed. In Proc. 2004 AAAI Fall Symposium on Making Pen-based Interaction Intelligent and Natural (2004), pp. 152-158.
4. LANK E., SAUND E.: Sloppy selection: providing an accurate interpretation of imprecise selection gestures. Computers and Graphics 29, 4 (2005) (Special Issue on Pen Computing), pp. 183-192.
5. NOTOWIDIGDO M., MILLER R. C.: Off-line sketch interpretation. In Proc. AAAI Fall Symposium Series 2004: Making Pen-Based Interaction Intelligent and Natural (2004), pp. 120-126.
6. GENNARI L., KARA L. B., STAHOVICH T. F.: Combining geometry and domain knowledge to interpret hand-drawn diagrams. Computers & Graphics 29, 4 (2005), pp. 547-562.
7. SEZGIN T. M, DAVIS R.: HMM-based efficient sketch recognition. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2005), pp. 281-283.
8. HSE H., NEWTON A. R.: Sketched symbol recognition using Zernike moments. In Proc. 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (2004), pp. 367-370.
9. KARA L. B., STAHOVICH T. F.: An imagebased trainable symbol recognizer for sketch-based interfaces. In Proc. AAAI Fall Symposium Series 2004: Making Pen-Based Interaction Intelligent and Natural (2004), pp. 99-105.
10. ALVARADO C, DAVIS R.: SketchREAD: a multi-domain sketch recognition engine. In Proc. 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2004), pp. 23-32.
11. KALRA D., BARR A. H.: A constraint-based figure-maker. In Proc. European Computer Graphics Conference and Exhibition (1990), pp. 413-424.
12. ALDEFELD B.: Variation of geometries based on a geometric reasoning method. Computer Aided Design 20, 3 (1998), pp. 117-126.
13. BOUMA W., FUDOS I., HOFFMANN C. M., CAI J., PAIGE R.: A geometric constraint solver. Computer Aided Design 27, 6 (1995), pp. 487-501.
14. FUDOS I., HOFFMANN C. M.: A graphconstructive approach to solving systems of geometric constraints. ACM Trans. on Graphics 16 (1997), pp. 179-216.
15. BORNING A., DUISBERG R.: Constraintbased tools for building user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5, 4 (1986), pp. 345-374.
16. WALLNER J., SCHROCKER H. P., HU S. M.: Tolerances in geometric constraint problems. Reliable Computing 11, 3 (2005), pp. 235-251.
17. BIER E. A., STONE M. C: Snap-Dragging. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 20, 4 (1986), pp. 233-240.
18. KARSENTY S., WEIKART C, LANDAY J. A.: Inferring graphical constraint with Rockit. In Proc. Conference on People and Computer VII (1993), pp. 137-153.
19. OSADA R., FUNKHOUSER T, CHAZELLE B., DOBKIN D.: Shape distribution. ACM Trans. on Graphics 21, 4(2002), pp. 807-832.
20. BELONGIES S., MALIK J., PUZICHA J.: Shape matching and object recognition using shape context. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 24 (2002), pp. 509-522.
21. SANKOFF D., KRUSKAL J. B.: Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules. The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison (1983), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.