Perceived behavior control and its influence on the adoption of software tools

Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 169-173

  Levy Ben Bassat, Ronit ^a   Ben Ari, Mordechai ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Jeliot; Program animation; Theory of planned behavior

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTERS; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INNOVATION; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; TEACHING;

ANIMATION SYSTEMS; BEHAVIOR CONTROLS; CONTROL ISSUES; JELIOT; LEARNING OF PROGRAMMINGS; LOW RATES; PEDAGOGICAL TOOLS; PROGRAM ANIMATION; SOFTWARE TOOLS; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; VISUALIZATION TOOLS;

CONCURRENCY CONTROL;

EID: 57349110643     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1384271.1384318     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Ajzen, I. (2002a). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
2. Ajzen, I. (2002b). Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations (Revised, 2006). Retrieved August, 8, 2006, from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
3. Ben-Ari, M, Myller, N., Sutinen, E., and Tarhio, J. (2002). Perspectives on program animation with Jeliot. In: Software Visualization: International Seminar, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2269, 31-45.
4. Ben-Bassat Levy, R., Ben-Ari, M. and Uronen, P.A. (2003). The Jeliot 2000 program animation system. Computers & Education, 40(1), 1-15.
5. Ben-Bassat Levy, R., and Ben-Ari, M. (2007). We work so hard and they don't use it: Acceptance of software tools by teachers. SIGCSE Bulletin 39(3), 246-250.
6. Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2), 185-199.
7. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Czemiak, C. M., Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., and Beck, J. (1999). Teachers' beliefs about using educational technology in the science classroom. International Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved August, 20, 2007, from http://smi.curtin.edu.au/ijet/vln2/czemiak/index.html
9. Ebel, G., and Ben-Ari, M. (2006). Affective effects of program visualization. Second International Computing Education Research Workshop. Canterbury, UK, 1-5.
10. Francis, J. J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Anne, W., Grimshaw, J., Robbie, F., Kaner, E. F. S., Smith, L., and Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing Questionnaires Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Manual for Health Services Researchers. Retrieved April, 12, 2007, from http://www.rebeqi.org/ ViewFile.aspx?itemID=212
11. Guzdial, M. (2006). Computing for Everyone: Improving Global Competitiveness and Understanding of the World. Retrieved September, 10, 2007, from http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/mediaCompplan/uploads/l/MarkGuzdial-ICER. doc
12. Hundhausen, C. D. (1997). [A meta-study of software visualization effectiveness.] Unpublished comprehensive exam paper, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon, Eugene. Retrieved November, 29, 2007, from http://eecs.wsu.edu/~veupl/pub/MetaStudy.pdf
13. Hundhausen, C. D., Douglas, S. A., and Stasko, J. T. (2002). A meta-study of algorithm visualization effectiveness. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 13(3), 259-290.
14. Kaput, J. J. (2000). Implications of the shift from isolated, expansive technology to connected, inexpensive, diverse and ubiquitous technologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Education, Auckland, NZ, 1-24.
15. Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., and Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21, 387-395.
16. Naps, T. L., Rößling, G., Almstrum, V., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Hundhausen, C, et al. (2002). Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2), 131-152
17. Schofield, J.W. (1995). Computers and Classroom Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. th Conference of the International Group of Mathematics Education, 5, 249-256.
19. [19]Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á., Pareja-Flores, C, and Urquiza-Fuentes, J. (2008). Computers & Education, 50, 179-192.