Forehead-lift: A 10-year review

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 391-394

  Patrocinio, Lucas G ^a,b   Patrocinio, José A ^a  

^a Department of Otolaryngology   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; ESTHETICS; EYEBROW; EYELID RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; FOREHEAD; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHYTIDOPLASTY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLEPHAROPLASTY; ESTHETICS; EYEBROWS; FEMALE; FOREHEAD; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHYTIDOPLASTY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN AGING; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 57349101498     PISSN: 15212491     EISSN: 15383660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.10.6.391     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Passot R. La chirurgie esthétique des rides du visage. Presse Med. 1919:27:258.
2. Patrocinio LG, Reinhart RJ, Patrocinio TG, Patrocinio JA. Endoscopic forehead lift. Rev Bras Otorinolaringol. 2006;72(5):624-630.
3. Knize DM. Muscles that act on glabellar skin: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):350-361.
4. Park JI, Hoagland TM, Park MS. Anatomy of the corrugator supercilli muscle. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(5):412-415.
5. Sabini P, Wayne I, Quatela VC. Anatomical guides to precisely localize the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Arch Facial Piast Surg. 2003;5(2):150-152.
6. Moss CJ. Mendelson BC, Taylor Gl. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000:105 (4):1475-1490.
7. Sullivan PK, Salomon JA, Woo AS. Freeman MB. The importance of the retaining ligamentous attachments of the forehead for selective eyebrow reshaping and forehead rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(1):95-104.
8. Nemoto M, Uchinuma E, Yamashina S. Three-dimensional analysis of forehead wrinkles. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(1):10-16.
9. Fox AJ, Tatum SA. The coronal incision: sinusoidal, sawtooth, and postauricular techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(3):259-262.
10. Hoicomb JD, McCollough EG. Trichophytic inclsional approaches to upper facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3(1):48-53.
11. Vasconez LO. The use of the endoscope in brow lifting. Video presentation at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons; September 1992; Washington, DC.
12. Isse NG. Endoscopic forehead lift. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Los Angeles County Society of Plastic Surgeons; September 12, 1992; Los Angeles, CA.
13. Ramirez OM. Anchor subperiosteal forehead lift: from open to endoscopic. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(3):868-871.
14. Trollius C. Subperiosteal brow lifts without fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(6):1595-1603.
15. Puig CM, LaFerriere KA. A retrospective comparison of open and endoscopic brow-lifts. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4(4):221-225.
16. Dayan SH, Perkins SW, Vartanian AJ, Wlesman IM. The forehead lift: endoscopic versus coronal approaches. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;25(1):35-39.
17. Elkwood A, Matarasso A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M, Godek CP. National plastic surgery survey: brow lifting techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108(7):2143-2150.
18. Chiu ES, Baker DC. Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(2):628-633.
19. Thomas JR, Lee AS, Patel AB. Brow-lift: subgaleal vs subperiosteal flap adherence In the rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(2):101-105.
20. Brodner DC, Downs JC, Graham HD III. Periosteal readhesion after brow-lift in New Zealand white rabbits. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4(4):248-251.
21. Krlet JD, Yang CY, Wang TD, Cook TA. Evaluation of pericranial skull adherence during healing in the rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(1):67-69.
22. Sclafani AP, Fozo MS, Romo T Ill, McCormlck SA. Strength and hlstological characteristics of periosteal fixation to bone after elevation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(1):63-66.
23. Kim JC, Crawford Downs J, Azuola ME, Graham HD III. Time scale for periosteal readheslon after brow lift. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(1):50-55.
24. Sidle DM, Loos BM, Ramirez AL, Kabaker SS, Maas CS. Use of BioGlue surgical adhesive for brow fixation in endoscopic browplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005; 7(6):393-397.
25. Holzapfel AM, Mangat DS. Endoscopic forehead-lift using a bioabsorbable fixation device. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(6):389-393.
26. Ducic Y, Adeison R. Use of the endoscopic forehead-lift to improve brow position in persistent facial paralysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(1):51-54.
27. Costantino PD, Hiltzik DH, Moche J, Preminger A. Minimally invasive brow suspension for facial paralysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(2):171-174.
28. Burroughs JR, Bearden WH, Anderson RL, McCann JD. Internal brow elevation at blepharoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8(1):36-41.
29. Kokoska MS, Amato JB, Hollenbeak CS, Glaser DA. Modifications of eyebrow position with botulinum exotoxin A. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4(4):244-247.
30. de la Torre Jl, Paulsen SM, Decordier B, Al-Hakeem MS, Vasconez LO. Secondary endoscopic forehead lift in patients with previous coronal brow lifts. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(3):251-255.