Projective image alignment by using ECC maximization

VISAPP 2008 - 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 413-420

  Evangelidis, Georgios D ^a   Psarakis, Emmanouil Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Correlation coefficient; Gradient methods; Image alignment; Image matching; Image registration; Mosaic construction; Motion estimation; Parametric motion

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; APPLICATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER VISION; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; CORRELATION METHODS; GRADIENT METHODS; IMAGE MATCHING; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MILITARY OPERATIONS; MOTION ESTIMATION; OPTICAL FLOWS; OPTIMIZATION; WEAVING;

ALIGNMENT ALGORITHMS; CAMERA MOTIONS; CLOSED-FORM SOLUTIONS; COMPUTER VISION APPLICATIONS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GEOMETRIC DEFORMATIONS; GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS; HIGHLY NONLINEAR; IMAGE ALIGNMENT; IMAGE PROFILES; ITERATIVE ALGORITHMS; ITERATIVE TECHNIQUES; MOSAIC CONSTRUCTION; NOISY CONDITIONS; NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PARAMETER VALUES; PARAMETRIC MOTION; PERFORMANCE CRITERIONS; PROJECTIVE TRANSFORMATIONS; REGISTRATION PROBLEMS; TO MANY;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 57349101492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Anandan, P. (1989). A computational framework and an algorithm for the measurement of visual motion. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2(3):283-310.
2. Baker, S. and Matthews, I. (2004). Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework: Part 1 : The quantity approximated, the warp update rule, and the gradient descent approximation, volume 56, pages 221-255.
3. Evangelidis, G. D. and Psarakis, E. Z. (2007). Parametric image alignment using enhanced correlation co-efficient maximization. Submitted to IEEE Trans. on PAMI, submission TPAMI-0026-0107.
4. Fuh, C. and Maragos, P. (1991). Motion dislpacement estimation using an affine model for image matching. Optical Engineering, 30(7):881-887.
5. Gleicher, M. (1997). Projective registration with difference decomposition. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '97). San Juan, Puerto Rico.
6. Hager, G. D. and Belhumeur, P. N. (1998). Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 20(10):1025-1039.
7. Johnson, H. and Christensen, G. (2002). Consistent landmark and intensity-based image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(5):450-461.
8. Lucas, B. D. and Kanade, T. (1981). An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In Proc. of 7th International Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Vancouver, British Columbia.
9. Psarakis, E. Z. and Evangelidis, G. D. (2005). An enhanced correlation-based method for stereo correspondence with sub-pixel accuracy. In Proc. of 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2005). Beijing, China.
10. Radke, R., Ramadge, P., Echigo, T., and Iisaku, S. (2000). Efficiently estimating projective transformations. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'00), pages 232-235. Vancouver,Canada.
11. Shum, H. and Szeliski, R. (2000). Construction of panoramic image mosaics with global and local alignment. International Journal on Computer Vision, 36(2): 101-130.
12. Szeliski, R. (2005). Handbook of Mathematical Models of Computer Vision. Springer, ch. 17.
13. Szeliski, R. (2006). Image alignment and stitching: A tutorial. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Computer Vision, 2(1):1-104.