Surface boundary conditions in two-dimensional dual-permeability modeling of tile drain bromide leaching

Vadose Zone Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1241-1255

  Dusek, Jaromir ^a   Gerke, Horst H ^b   Vogel, Tomas ^a  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROMIDE; DUAL POROSITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LEACHING; MASS TRANSFER; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERMEABILITY; PREFERENTIAL FLOW; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TILE DRAIN; TRACER;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 57349097220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15391663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0175     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bear, J., and Y. Bachmat. 1991. Introduction to modeling of transport phenomena in porous media. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
2. Bear, J., and A. Verruijt. 1987. Modeling groundwater flow and pollution. (Theory and applications of transport in porous media). D. Riedel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
3. Beven, K.J., and P. Germann. 1982. Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour. Res. 18:1311-1325.
4. Boivin, A., J. Šimůnek, M. Schiavon, and M.Th. van Genuchten. 2006. Comparison of pesticide transport processes in three tile-drained field soils using HYDRUS-2D. Vadose Zone J. 5:838-849.
5. Bronstert, A., and A. Bárdossy. 1999. The role of spatial variability of soil moisture for modelling surface runoff generation at the small catchment scale. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 3:505-516.
6. Bronstert, A., and A. Bárdossy. 2003. Uncertainty of runoff modelling at the hillslope scale due to temporal variations of rainfall intensity. Phys. Chem. Earth 28:283-288.
7. Chen, X.M., M. Vanclooster, and G.X. Pan. 2002. Impact of soil water flux on vadose zone solute transport parameters. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33:479-492.
8. Feddes, R.A., P.J. Kowalik, and H. Zaradny. 1978. Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
9. Flury, M., H. Flühler, W.A. Jury, and J. Leuenberger. 1994. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: A field study. Water Resour. Res. 30:1945-1954.
10. Flury, M., M.V. Yates, and W.A. Jury. 1999. Numerical analysis of the effect of the lower boundary condition on solute transport in lysimeters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1493-1499.
11. Gabellani, S., G. Boni, L. Ferraris, J. von Hardenberg, and A. Provenzale. 2007. Propagation of uncertainty from rainfall to runoff: A case study with a stochastic rainfall generator. Adv. Water Resour. 30:2061-2071.
12. Gärdenäs, A.I., J. Šimůnek, N. Jarvis, and M.Th. van Genuchten. 2006. Two-dimensional modelling of preferential water flow and pesticide transport from a tile-drained field. J. Hydrol. 329:647-660.
13. Gerke, H.H. 2006. Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169:382-400.
14. Gerke, H.H., J. Dušek, T. Vogel, and J.M. Köhne. 2007. Two-dimensional dual-permeability analyses of a bromide tracer experiment on a tile-drained field. Vadose Zone J. 6:651-667.
15. Gerke, H.H., and J.M. Köhne. 2004. Dual-permeability modeling of preferential bromide leaching from a tile drained glacial till agricultural field. J. Hydrol. 289:239-257.
16. Gerke, H.H., and M.Th. van Genuchten. 1993. A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resour. Res. 29:305-319.
17. Gerke, H.H., and M.Th. van Genuchten. 1996. Macroscopic representation of structural geometry for simulating water and solute movement in dual-porosity media. Adv. Water Resour. 19:343-357.
18. Haude, W. 1955. Zur Bestimmung der Verdunstung auf möglichst einfache Weise. (In German.) Mitt. Dtsch. Wetterdienst 11:1-24.
19. Hearman, A.J., and C. Hinz. 2007. Sensitivity of point scale surface runoff predictions to rainfall resolution. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11:965-982.
20. Jarvis, N. 1994. The MACRO model (Version 3.1): Technical description and sample simulations. In Rep. and Diss. 19. Dep. of Soil Sci., Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., Uppsala.
21. Jarvis, N.J. 2007. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: Principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58:523-546.
22. Kätterer, T., B. Schmied, K.C. Abbaspour, and R. Schulin. 2001. Single- and dual-porosity modelling of multiple tracer transport through soil columns: Effects of initial moisture and mode of application. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52:25-36.
23. Kohler, A., K.C. Abbaspour, M. Fritsch, M.Th. van Genuchten, and R. Schulin. 2001. Simulating unsaturated flow and transport in a macroporous soil to tile drains subject to an entrance head: Model development and preliminary evaluation. J. Hydrol. 254:67-81.
24. Köhne, J.M. 1999. Analyse präferentiellen Wasserflusses und Stofftransports in strukturierten Böden mit Hilfe eines Dual-Porositätsmodells. Ph.D. diss. (In German, with English summary.) In H. Roweck and B. Lennartz (ed.) Schriftenreihe Inst. Water Manage. and Landsc. Ecol. 30. Christian-Albrechts-Univ., Kiel, Germany.
25. Köhne, J.M., and H.H. Gerke. 2005. Spatial and temporal dynamics of preferential bromide movement towards a tile drain. Vadose Zone J. 4:79-88.
26. Köhne, J.M., and B.P. Mohanty. 2005. Water flow processes in a soil column with a cylindrical macropore: Experiment and hierarchical modeling. Water Resour. Res. 41:W03010, doi:10.1029/2004WR003303.
27. Köhne, S., B. Lennartz, J.M. Köhne, and J. Šimů nek. 2006. Bromide transport at a tile-drained field site: Experiment, and one- and two-dimensional equilibrium and non-equilibrium numerical modeling. J. Hydrol. 321:390-408.
28. Larsson, M.H., and N.J. Jarvis. 1999. Evaluation of a dual-porosity model to predict field-scale solute transport in a macroporous soil. J. Hydrol. 215:153-171.
29. Leij, F.J., J.H. Dane, and M.Th. van Genuchten. 1991. Mathematical analysis of one-dimensional solute transport in a layered soil profile. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:944-953.
30. Lennartz, B., J. Michaelsen, W. Wichtmann, and P. Widmoser. 1999. Time variance analysis of preferential solute movement at a tile-drained field site. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:39-47.
31. Nash, J.E., and J.V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10:282-290.
32. Parker, J.C., and M.Th. van Genuchten. 1984. Flux-averaged and volume-averaged concentrations in continuum approaches to solute transport. Water Resour. Res. 20:866-872.
33. Ray, C., T. Vogel, and J. Dušek. 2004. Modeling depth-variant and domain-specific sorption and biodegradation in dual-permeability media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 70:63-87.
34. Roy, J.W., G.W. Parkin, and C. Wagner-Riddle. 2000. Water flow in unsaturated soil below turfgrass: Observations and LEACHM (within EXPRES) predictions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:86-93.
35. Steenhuis, T.S., and M.F. Walter. 1980. Closed form solution for pesticide loss in runoff water. Trans. ASAE 23:615-620.
36. Šimůnek, J., N.J. Jarvis, M.Th. van Genuchten, and A. Gärdenäs. 2003. Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone. J. Hydrol. 272:14-35.
37. Toride, N., F.J. Leij, and M.Th. van Genuchten. 1993. Flux-averaged concentrations for transport in soils having nonuniform initial solute distributions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:1406-1409.
38. van Genuchten, M.Th., and P.J. Wierenga. 1976. Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40:473-480.
39. Vaughan, P.J., P.J. Shouse, S. Goldberg, D.L. Suarez, and J.E. Ayars. 2004. Boron transport within an agricultural field: Uniform flow versus mobile-immobile water model simulations. Soil Sci. 169:401-412.
40. Vereecken, H., and M. Dust. 1998. Modeling water flow and pesticide transport at lysimeter and field scale. p. 189-202. In F. Fuhr et al. (ed.) The lysimeter concept: Environmental behavior of pesticides. ACS Symp. Ser. 699. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.
41. Vervoort, R.W., D.E. Radcliffe, and L.T. West. 1999. Soil structure development and preferential solute flow. Water Resour. Res. 35:913-928.
42. Vogel, T., and M. Císlerová. 1988. On the reliability of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity calculated from the moisture retention curve. Transp. Porous Media 3:1-15.
43. Vogel, T., H.H. Gerke, R. Zhang, and M.Th. van Genuchten. 2000. Modeling flow and transport in a two-dimensional dual-permeability system with spatially variable hydraulic properties. J. Hydrol. 238:78-89.
44. Vogel, T., L. Lichner, J. Dušek, and A. Čipá ková. 2007. Dual-continuum analysis of a cadmium tracer field experiment. J. Contam. Hydrol. 92:50-65.
45. Vogel, T., M.Th. van Genuchten, and M. Císlerová. 2001. Effect of the shape of the soil hydraulic functions near saturation on variably-saturated flow predictions. Adv. Water Resour. 24:133-144.
46. Wang, K., R.D. Zhang, and H. Yasuda. 2006. Characterizing heterogeneity of soil water flow by dye infiltration experiments. J. Hydrol. 328:559-571.
47. Wichtmann, W., B. Lennartz, and P. Widmoser. 1998. Bromidverlagerung an zwei gedränten Standorten in Schleswig-Holstein. (In German.) J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 161:121-128.
48. Zehe, E., R. Becker, A. Bárdossy, and E. Plate. 2005. Uncertainty of simulated catchment runoff response in the presence of threshold processes: Role of initial soil moisture and precipitation. J. Hydrol. 315:183-202.
49. Zehe, E., and H. Flühler. 2001. Preferential transport of isoproturon at a plot scale and a field-scale tile-drained site. J. Hydrol. 247:100-115.