Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 3-5

  Shamoo, Adil E ^a   Schwartz, Jack ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Maryland Attorney General's Office

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSONNEL; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BENEFICENCE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MARYLAND; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STATE GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 57349094418     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802513077     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Advisory Committee onHumanRadiation Experiments. 1995. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2. Animal Welfare Act. 1966. PL 89-544. Amended in PL 91-579 (1970) and in PL 94-279 (1976).
3. Beauchamp, T. L., and Childress, J. F. 1994. Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Code of Federal Regulations. 2006b. Title 45 Part 46.
5. Code of Federal Regulations. 2006a. Title 21 Part 56.
6. Maryland Laws. 2002. Chapter 552, Enacting Health-General Article Title 13, Subtitle 20.
7. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). 2001. Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants, Vol. 1, Report and recommendations. Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
8. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
9. Schwartz, J. 2001. Oversight of human subject research: The role of the states. In National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2001. Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants, Vol. 2, commissioned papers and staff analysis, NBAC. Bethesda, MD: NBAC.
10. Shamoo, A. E. (ed). 1997. Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects. Amsterdam,The Netherlands: Gordon and Breach Publishers OPA.
11. Shamoo, A. E. 1999. Unregulated research with human subjects. Accountability in Research 6: 205-214.
12. Shamoo, A. E. 2001. Adverse events reporting - the tip of an iceberg, Accountability in Research 8: 197-218.
13. Shamoo, A. E., and Sharav, V. H. 1997. Unethical use of persons with mental illness in high risk research experiments. BioLaw 2: S23-S31.
14. Shamoo, A. E., and L. Strause. 2004. Closing the gap in regulations for the protection of human subjects in research. Monitor Spring: 15-18.
15. Slater, E. 2002. IRB reform. New England Journal of Medicine 346: 1402-1404.
16. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 1979. Belmont Report. Available at: http://ohrp.osophs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/belmont. htm (accessed June 12, 2006).
17. United States Food and Drug Administration. 2003. Warning letter. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning letters/g3936d.pdf (accessed November 12, 2003).