Carbon sequestration of Pinus elliottii plantation in relation with water consumption in subtropical China

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 5322-5330

  Liu, Qi Jing ^a   Zeng, Hui Qing ^b,c   Ma, Ze Qing ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

^b RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Biomass; Carbon sequestration; Growth model; Sap flow

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; AFFORESTATION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DRY MATTER; EDDY COVARIANCE; FLOW VELOCITY; GROWTH MODELING; GROWTH RATE; PLANTATION; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SAP FLOW; SELF THINNING; SUBTROPICAL REGION; TRANSPIRATION; WATER USE;

PINUS ELLIOTTII;

EID: 57349092610     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Pedersen D. Disease ecology at a crossroads: Man-made environments, human rights and perpetual development Utopias. Social Science & Medicine, 1996, 43(5): 745-758.
2. Führer E. Forest functions, ecosystem stability and management. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 132(1): 29-38.
3. Li W H, Deng K M, Li F. The biomass of the main forest ecosystems in Changbai Mountain. Forest Ecosystem Research, 1981, 2: 34-50.
4. Conard S G, Ivanova G A. Wildfire in Russian boreal forests-potential impacts of fire regime characteristics on emissions and global carbon balance estimates. Environmental Pollution, 1997, 98(3): 305-313.
5. Scrimgeour F, Oxley L, Fatai K. Reducing carbon emissions? The relative effectiveness of different types of environmental tax: the case of New Zealand. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(11): 1439-1448.
6. Litynski J T, Klara S M, McIlvried H G, et al. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: A collaborative approach to carbon management. Environment International, 2006, 32(1): 128-144.
7. Dong J, Kaufmann R K, Myneni R B, et al. Remote sensing estimates of boreal and temperate forest woody biomass: carbon pools, sources, and sinks. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 84(3): 393-410.
8. 2 flux above a tropical rain forest at Pasoh in Peninsular Malaysia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2003, 114(3-4): 235-244.
9. Tuyl S V, Law B E, Turner D P, et al. Variability in net primary production and carbon storage in biomass across Oregon forests - an assessment integrating data from forest inventories, intensive sites, and remote sensing. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 209(3): 273-291.
10. Jia S, Akiyama T. A precise, unified method for estimating carbon storage in cool-temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 134(1-4): 70-80.
11. Liu Q J, Hu L L, Li X R. Plant diversity in Qianyanzhou after 20 years of small watershen treatment. Acta Phytoecological Sinica, 2005, 29(5): 766-774.
12. Li X R, Liu Q J, Chen Y R, et al. Aboveground biomass of three conifers in Qianyanzhou plantation. Applied Ecology, 2006, 17: 1382-1388.
13. Granier A, Biron P, Lemoine D. Water balance, transpiration and canopy conductance in two beech stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2000, 100: 291-308.
14. Lu P, Urban L, Zhao P. Granier's Thermal Dissipation Probe (TDP) Method for Measuring Sap Flow in Trees: Theory and Practice. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2004, 46(6): 631-646.
15. Yuan X H. Effects on organic carbon storage in different land use systems in red earth hilly area. The Master Dissertation of the Institute of Remote Sensing Applications. CAS, 1999.
16. 2 fluxes from eub-tropical plantation coniferous ecosystem. Science in China Science D, 2006, 36(A01): 91-102.
17. Wilson K B, Hanson P J, Mulholland P J, et al. A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001 , 106: 153-168.
18. Running S W, Coughlan J C. A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecology Model, 1988, 42: 125-154.
19. Running S W, Hunt R E. Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME_BGC, and an application for global-scale models. Ehleringer J R and Field C B. Scaling Physiologic Processes: Leaf to Globe. San Diego: Academic Press, 1993. 141-158.
20. Zhao P, Rao X Q, Ma L, et al. Sap flow-scaled stand transpiration and canopy stomatal conductance in an Acacia manaium forest. Acta Phytoecological Sinica, 2006, 30(4): 655-665.
21. Tu J, Liu Q J. Sap flow scaling-up of artificial Pinus elliottii forests in subtropical red earth area and its response to environmental factors. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21: 197-200.