Using semantic distances for reasoning with inconsistent ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5318 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 178-194

  Huang, Zhisheng ^a   Van Harmelen, Frank ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ONTOLOGY; SYNTACTICS;

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE GAIN; REASONING PERFORMANCE; REASONING SYSTEM; SEMANTIC DISTANCE; SEMANTIC RELEVANCE; SYNTACTIC APPROACH;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 57349090281     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Belnap, N.: A useful four-valued logic. In: Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 8-37. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)
2. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Semantic distance in wordnet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures. In: Workshop on WordNet, Pittsburgh, PA (2001)
3. Chopra, S., Parikh, R., Wassermann, R.: Approximate belief revision- prelimininary report. Journal of IGPL (2000)
4. Cilibrasi, R., Vitany, P.: The Google similarity distance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(3), 370-383 (2007)
5. Cilibrasi, R., Vitanyi, P.: Automatic meaning discovery using Google. Technical report, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, CWI (2004)
6. d'Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., Motta, E.: Characterizing knowledge on the semantic web with watson. In: 5th International EON Workshop at ISWC 2007 (2007)
7. Gligorov, R., Aleksovski, Z., ten Kate,W., van Harmelen, F.: Using Google distance to weight approximate ontology matches. In: Proceedings of WWW 2007 (2007)
8. Haase, P.: Semantic Technologies for Distributed Information Systems. PhD thesis at the Universität Karlsruhe (2006)
9. Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y.: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
10. Hameed, A., Preece, A., Sleeman, D.: Ontology reconciliation. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, pp. 231-250. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
11. Huang, Z., van Harmelen, F.: Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies: Evaluation. Project Report D3.4.2, SEKT (2006)
12. Huang, Z., van Harmelen, F., ten Teije, A.: Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2005 (2005)
13. Huang, Z., van Harmelen, F., ten Teije, A., Groot, P., Visser, C.: Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies: a general framework. Project Report D3.4.1, SEKT (2004)
14. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, Wisconsin (July 1998)
15. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 251-263. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
16. Rector, A., Drummond, N., Horridge, M., Rogers, J., Knublauch, H., Stevens, R., Wang, H., Wroe, C.: Owl pizzas: Practical experience of teaching owl-dl - common errors and common patterns. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds.) EKAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3257, pp. 63-81. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
17. Schlobach, S.: Debugging and semantic clarification by pinpointing. In: GómezPérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 226-240. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
18. Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2003 (2003)
19. Volker, J., Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y., Hotho, A.: Learning disjointness. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)