Cross-cultural adaptation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire into Hungarian and investigation of its validity in patients with systemic sclerosis

Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 776-784

  Varjú, Cecília ^a   Bálint, Zsófia ^a   Solyom, Alexander I ^a   Farkas, Helka ^a   Kárpáti, Eszter ^a   Berta, Boglárka ^a   Kumánovics, Gabór ^a   Czirják, László ^a   Nagy, Zoltán ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

DASH; Disability; Functional assessment questionnaire; Quality of life; QuickDASH; Scleroderma; Sensitivity to change; Systemic sclerosis; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM JOINT AND HAND QUESTIONNAIRE; DISABILITY SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUNGARY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCLERODERMA; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;

AGED; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUNGARY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SCLERODERMA, LOCALIZED; SCLERODERMA, SYSTEMIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 57249116226     PISSN: 0392856X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AKESSON A, FIORI G, KRIEG T, VAN DEN HOOGEN FH, SEIBOLD JR: Assessment of skin, joint, tendon and muscle involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2003; 21 (Suppl. 29): S5-8.
2. MEDSGER TA JR, BOMBARDIERI S, CZIRJÁK L, SCORZA R, DELLA ROSSA A, BENCIVELLI W: Assessment of disease severity and prognosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2003; 21 (Suppl. 29): S42-6.
3. HUDAK PL, AMADIO PC, BOMBARDIER C: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-8,
4. DAVIS AM, BEATON DE, HUDAK P et al.: Measuring disability of the upper extremity: A rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Ther 1999; 12: 269-74.
5. BOT SD, TERWEE CB, VAN DER WINDT DA, BOUTER LM, DEKKER J, DE VET HC: Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability quAstionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 335-41.
6. BEATON DE, WRIGHT JG, KATZ JN: Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of the three item-reduction approaches. J. Bone Surg (Am) 2005; 87: 1038-46.
7. SANDQVIST G, EKLUND M: Hand Mobility Tn Scleroderma (HAMIS) test: the reliability of a novel hand function test. Arthritis Care Res 2000; 13: 369-74.
8. SANDQVIST G, AKLUND M: Validity of HAMIS: a test of hand mobility in scleroderma. Arthritis Care Res 2000; 13: 382-7.
9. POOLE JL, GALLEGOS M, O'LINC S: Reliability and validity of the Arthritis Hand Function Test in adults with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Care Res 2000; 13: 69-73.
10. ROBERTS-THOMSON AJ, MASSY-WESTROPP N, SMITH MD, AHERN MJ, HIGHTON J, ROBERTS-THOMSON PJ: The use of the hand anatomic index to assess deformity and impaired function in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol Int 2006; 26:, 439-44..
11. SILMAN A, AKESSON A, NEWMAN J et al.: Assessment of, functional ability in patients with scleroderma: A proposed new disability assessment instrument. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 79-83.
12. RANNOU F, POIRAUDEAU S, BEREZNE A et al.: Assessing disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: Construct validities of the Cochin Hand Function Scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Systemic Sclerosis HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 94-102.
13. BROWER LM, POOLE JL: Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 805-9.
14. SMYTH AE, MACGREGOR AJ, MUKERJEE D, BROUGH GM, BLACK CM, DENTON CP; A cross-sectional comparison of three self-reported functional indices in scleroderma. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42: 732-8.
15. JOHN M, ANGST F, PAP G, JUNGE A, MANNION AF: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 195-205.
16. HERVAS MT, NAVARRO COLLADO MJ, PEIRO S, RODRIGO PEREZ JL, LOPEZ MATEU P, MARTINEZ TELLO I: Spanish version of the DASH questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Med Clin (Barc) 2006; 127: 441-7.
17. OFFENBACHER M, EWERT T, SANGHA O, STUCKI G: Validation of a German version of the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand' questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 2003; 62: 168-77.
18. PADUA R, PADUA L, CECCARELLI E et al.: Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation, J Hand Surg (Br) 2003; 28: 179-86.
19. ATROSHI I, GUMMESSON C, ANDERSSON B, DAHLGREN E, JOHANSSON A: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 613-8.
20. IMAEDA T, TOH S, NAKAO Y et al.: Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 353-9.
21. IMAEDA T, TOH S, WADAT et al.: Version of the Quick Disability of the Ann, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11: 248-53.
22. ORFALE AG, ARAUJO PM, FERRAZ MB, NATOUR J: Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005; 38: 293-302,
23. NAVSARIKAR A, GLADMAN DD, HUSTED JA, COOK RJ: Validity assessment of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) for patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 2191-4.
24. LEROY EC, MEDSGER TA JR: Criteria for the classification of early sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 1573-6.
25. BEATON DE, BOMBARDIER C, GUILLEMIN F, FERRAZ MB: Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-91.
26. WARE JE JR, SHERBOURNE CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
27. POOLE JL, STEEN VD: The use of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to determine physical disability in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4: 27-31.
28. STEEN VD, MEDSGER TA JR: The value of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and special patient-generated scales to demonstrate change in systemic sclerosis patients over time. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 1984-91.
29. MORITA Y, MURO Y, SUGIURA K, TOMITA Y, TAMAKOSHI K: Results of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis - measuring functional impairment in systemic sclerosis versus other connective tissue diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 367-72.
30. KAHALEH MB, SUTTANY GL, SMITH EA, HUFFSTUTTER JE, LOADHOLT CB, LEROY EC: A modified scleroderma skin scoring method. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1986; 4: 367-9:
31. CZIRJÁK L, NAGY Z, ARINGER M, RIEME-KASTEN G, MATUCCI-CERINIC M, FURST DE; on behalf of EUSTAR: The EUSTAR model for teaching and implementing the modified Rodnan skin score in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 966-9.
32. MCHORNEY CA, TARLOV AR: Individual-patient monitoring in practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293-307.
33. ALTMAN DG: Practical statistics for medical research. London, Chapman & Hall, 1991: 404.
34. KHANNA D, FURST DE, HAYS RD et al.: Minimally important difference in diffuse systemic sclerosis: Results from the D-penicillamine study. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 1325-9.
35. MAHEU E, CADET C, MARTY M et al.: Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of various methods to measure joint space width in osteoarthritis of the hip: A double reading of three different radiographic views taken with a three-year interval. Arthritis Res Ther 2005; 7: R1375-85.
36. TAAL E, RASKER JJ, RIEMSMA RP: Sensitivity to change of AIMS2 and AIMS2-SF components in comparison to M-HAQ and VAS-pain. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 1655-8.
37. GAY RE, MADSON TJ, CIESLAK KR: Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007; 30: 259-62.
38. KATZ JN, LARSON MG, PHILLIPS CB, FOSSEL AH, LIANG MH: Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992; 30: 917-25.
39. REVICKI DA, CELLA D, HAYS RD, SLOAN JA, LENDERKING WA, AARONSON NK: Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 70.