Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: Evolution of the SQUIRE project (Journal of General Internal Medicine DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0797-4);Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: Evolution of the SQUIRE project

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2125-2130

  Davidoff, Frank ^a   Batalden, Paul ^b   Stevens, David ^b   Ogrinc, Greg ^b,c   Mooney, Susan ^b,d  

^a Institute for Healthcare Improvement   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^c White River Junction VA ^*  (United States)

^d Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Publication; Quality improvement; Standards

Indexed keywords

EPISTEMOLOGY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; HEALTH CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EDITORIAL POLICIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 57249095854     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0836-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (32)

1. F Davidoff P Batalden 2005 Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project Qual Saf Health Care 14 319 325
2. EQUATOR Network. Enhancing the QUality And Transparency Of health Research. Available at: http://www.equator-network.org. Accessed May 9, 2008.
3. T Janisse 2007 A next step: reviewer feedback on quality improvement publication guidelines Permanente Journal 11 1
4. Guidelines for authors: guidelines for submitting more extensive quality research. Quality and Safety in Health Care. Available at: http://qshc.bmj.com/ ifora/article_type.dtl#extensive
5. D Berwick 2005 Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine Qual Saf Health Care 14 315 316
6. RG Thomson 2005 Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual Saf Health Care 14 317 318
7. MH Chin AT Chien 2006 Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship Qual Saf Health Care 15 79 80
8. GR Baker 2006 Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care Qual Saf Health Care 15 150 151
9. P Pronovost R Wachter 2006 Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back Qual Saf Health Care 15 152 153
10. Gawande A. The checklist. The New Yorker. December 10, 2007, pp. 86-95.
11. D Rennie 1995 Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers JAMA 273 1054 1055
12. JW Williams JR Holleman GP Samsa DL Simel 1995 Randomized controlled trial of 3 vs 10 days of timethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for acute maxillary sinusitis JAMA 273 1015 1021
13. Rutledge A. On Creativity. Available at http://www.alistapart/articles/ oncreativity. Accessed on May 9, 2008.
14. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002.
15. RA Day 1989 The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format J Am Med Writ Assoc 4 16 18
16. Huth EJ. The research paper: general principles for structure and content. In Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999, pp. 63-73.
17. Jadad AR, Enkin MW. Randomized Controlled Trials. Questions, Answers, and Musings. 2London: Blackwell Publishing/BMJ Books; 2007.
18. P Batalden F Davidoff 2007 Teaching quality improvement. The devil is in the details JAMA 298 1059 1061
19. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
20. R Pawson T Greenhalgh G Harvey K Walshe 2005 Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions J Health Serv Res Policy 10 Suppl 1 21 34
21. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
22. Evaluation for the 21st Century. In: E Chelimsky, William Shadish, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
23. Health Care Quality Improvement: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. In: Jennings B, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, eds. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center; 2007.
24. Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: What would succesful reform of medicine look like? In: Forest PG, McKintosh K, Marchilden G, eds. Health Care Services and the Process of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004.
25. E von Elm DG Altman M Egger S Pocock PC Gotzsche JP Vandenbroucke for the STROBE initiative 2007 The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Ann Intern Med 147 573 577
26. Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; Supplement, in press.
27. DG Altman KF Schulz D Moher M Egger F Davidoff D Elbourne PC Goetzsche T Lang CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) 2001 The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 134 663 694
28. PM Bossuyt JB Reitsma DE Bruns CA Gastonis PP Glasziou LM Irwig D Moher D Rennie HCW de Vet JG Lijmer 2003 The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration Clin Chem 49 7 18
29. JP Vandenbroucke E von Elm DG Altman P Gotzsche CD Mulrow SJ Pocock for the STROBE initiative 2007 Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 147 W 164
30. Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and Reporting Clinical Trials. A Guide to the CONSORT Statement and the Principles of Randomized Trials. Sydney: Australian Medical Publishing Company; 2007.
31. AC Plint D Moher A Morrison K Schulz DG Altman C Hill 2006 Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review Med J Aust 185 263 267
32. M Egger P Juni C Bartlett 2001 Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials JAMA 285 1996 1999