Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy: A prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 235-241

  Ham, Won Sik ^a   Park, Sung Yul ^a   Kim, Won Tae ^a   Koo, Kyo Chul ^a   Lee, Yong Seung ^a   Choi, Young Deuk ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Open radical prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Robotic radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

HOSPITALS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURVEYS; UROLOGY;

FOUR-GROUP; GLEASON SCORES; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS;

DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 57249089061     PISSN: 18632483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-008-0111-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. PC Walsh PJ Donker 1982 Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention J Urol 128 492 497
2. B Guillonneau H el-Fettouh H Baumert 2003 Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute J Urol 169 1261 1266
3. SB Bhayani CP Pavlovich TS Hsu 2003 Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy Urology 61 612 616
4. L Boccon-Gibod 2006 Radical prostatectomy: open? Laparoscopic? Robotic? Eur Urol 49 598 599
5. I Hara G Kawabata H Miyake 2003 Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Urol 169 2045 2048
6. J Jaffe O Stakhovsky X Cathelineau 2007 Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate J Urol 178 483 487
7. K Touijer B Guillonneau 2006 Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality Eur Urol 49 625 632
8. M Menon A Tewari B Baize 2002 Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience Urology 60 864 868
9. B Nelson M Kaufman G Broughton 2007 Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy J Urol 177 929 931
10. TM Webster SD Herrell SS Chang 2005 Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain J Urol 174 912 914
11. A Tewari A Srivasatava M Menon 2003 A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution BJU Int 92 205 210
12. F Rozet J Jaffe G Braud 2007 A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience J Urol 178 478 482
13. J Rassweiler O Seemann M Schulze 2003 Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution J Urol 169 1689 1693
14. L Salomon O Levrel A de la Taille 2002 Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center Eur Urol 42 104 110
15. PC Walsh P Marschke D Ricker 2000 Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy Urology 55 58 61
16. TE Ahlering D Woo L Eichel 2004 Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes Urology 63 819 822
17. TE Ahlering D Skarecky D Lee 2003 Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 170 1738 1741
18. M Menon A Shrivastava A Tewari 2002 Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes J Urol 168 945 949
19. RJ Palisaar J Noldus M Graefen 2005 Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure Eur Urol 47 176 184
20. J Rassweiler M Hruza D Teber 2006 Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy-critical analysis of the results Eur Urol 49 612 624