Factors affecting uptake of an education and physical activity programme for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

European Diabetes Nursing

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 17-22

  Visram, Shelina ^a   Bremmer, A S ^b   Harrington, B E ^c   Hawthorne, G ^d  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d NEWCASTLE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Education; Lifestyle; Patient experiences; Physical activity; Self management; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

EID: 57249084175     PISSN: 15517853     EISSN: 15517861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/edn.97     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Department of Health. Structured Patient Education in Diabetes. London: DoH, 2005.
2. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Diabetes. London: TSO, 2001.
3. NICE Health Technology Appraisal. Guidance on the use of Patient Education Models for Diabetes. London: NICE HTA no. 60, 2003.
4. Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ. Diet and exercise among adults with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1722-1728.
5. Garcia R, Suarez R. Diabetes education in the elderly: a 5-year follow-up of an interactive approach. Patient Educ Couns 1996; 29: 87-97.
6. Friedman NM, Gleeson JM, Kent MJ, et al. Management of diabetes mellitus in the Lovelace Health Systems' EPISODES OF CARE Program. Eff Clin Prac 1998; 1: 5-11.
7. Rickheim PL, Weaver TW, Flader JL, et al. Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomised study. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 269-274.
8. Cooper HC, Booth K, Gill G. Patients' perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 191-206.
9. Kirk A, Mutrie N, MacIntyre P, et al. Increasing physical activity in people with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1186-1192.
10. Krook A, Holm I, et al. Reduction of risk factors following lifestyle modification programme in subjects with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2003; 23: 21-30.
11. Matteucci E, Giamietro O. Closing the gap between literature and practice: evaluation of a teaching programme (in the absence of a structured treatment) on both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2003; 16: 298-305.
12. Clark M, Hampson SE, et al. Effects of a brief tailored intervention on the process and predictors of lifestyle behaviour change in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Psychol Health Med 2004; 9: 440-449.
13. Harland J, White M, et al. The Newcastle exercise project: a randomised controlled trial of methods to promote physical activity in primary care. BMJ 1999; 319: 828-832.
14. Department of Health. At least five a week: evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. A report from the Chief Medical Officer. London: TSO, 2004.
15. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes [UKPDS 33]. Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
16. Boule NG, Haddad E, et al. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001; 286: 1218-1227.
17. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, et al. Prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1343-1350.
18. Holland J, Furness J, et al. A supervised exercise programme for people with diabetes. J Diab Nurs 2002; 6: 153-156.
19. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM, et al. Preliminary outcome evaluation of the First Step Program: a daily physical activity intervention for adults with Type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 47: 23-28.
20. Moffatt S, White M, et al. The impact of welfare advice in primary care: a qualitative study. Crit Pub Health 2004; 14: 295-309.
21. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 1997.
22. Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
23. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage, 1998.
24. Richie J, Lewis R. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 2003.
25. Seefeldt V, Malina RM, Clark MA. Factors affecting levels of physical activity in adults. Sports Med 2002; 32: 143-168.
26. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.
27. DiLoreto C, Fanelloe C, et al. Validation of a counselling strategy to promote the adoption and the maintenance of physical activity by Type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 404-408.
28. Skinner TC, Cradock S, et al. Four theories and a philosophy: self-management education for individuals newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum 2003; 16: 75-80.