Linearization-based word-part ellipsis

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 261-307

  Chaves, Rui P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Constraint based grammar; Coordination; Ellipsis

Indexed keywords

EID: 57149147949     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-008-9040-3     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. B. Abbott 1976 Right node raising as a test for constituenthood Linguistic Inquiry 7 639 642
2. Alsina, A. (1990). Predicate composition: A theory of syntactic function alternations. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
3. Anderson S. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Artstein, R. (2002). Coordination of word parts: A surface level account. In G. Katz, S. Reinhard, & P. Reuter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Semantik (pp. 1-15). University of Osnabrück.
5. R. Artstein 2005 Coordination of parts of words Lingua 115 4 359 393
6. Ashby W. (1977) Clitic inflection in French: An historical perspective. Rodopi, Amsterdam
7. L. Bauer 1998 When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language Linguistics 2 65 86
8. Beavers, J., & Sag, I. A. (2004). Ellipsis and apparent non-constituent coordination. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (pp. 48-69). Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/5/.
9. Booij G. (1985) Coordination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology. In: van der Hulst H., Smith N. (eds) Advances in nonlinear phonology, Vol. 7 of linguistic models. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 143-160
10. Booij G.E. (2005) Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In: Dressler W.U., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O.E., Rainer F. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations, Number 264 in current issues in linguistic theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp 109-132
11. J. Bresnan 1974 On the position of certain clause-particles in phrase structure Linguistic Inquiry 5 614 619
12. J. Bresnan S.A. Mchombo 1995 The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13 181 252
13. Chaves, R. P. (2007). Coordinate structures-Constraint-based syntax-semantics processing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon.
14. Chaves, R. P., & Sag, I. A. (2007). Two kinds of ellipsis in English coordinate structures. Under review for journal publication.
15. Chomsky N. (1970) Remarks on nominalization. In: Jacobs A., Rosenbaum P. (eds) Readings in transformational grammar. Ginn and Co, Waltham (MA), pp 184-221
16. A. Copestake D. Flickinger I.A. Sag C. Pollard 2006 Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction Journal Research on Language & Computation 3 4 281 332
17. Crysmann, B. (2002). Constraint-based coanalysis-Portuguese cliticisation and morphology-syntax interaction in HPSG. PhD Thesis, Saarland University.
18. Crysmann, B. (2003). An asymmetric theory of peripheral sharing in HPSG. In G. Jäger, P. Monachesi, G. Penn, & S. Wintner (Eds.), Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2003 (pp. 47-62). Vienna, Austria: ESSLLI 2003.
19. Di Sciullo A.M., Williams E. (1987) On the definition of word. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Donohue, C., & Sag, I. A. (1999). Domains in Warlpiri. In Sixth International Conference on HPSGAbstract (pp. 101-106). University of Edinburgh.
21. Dowty D.R. (1988) Type-raising, functional composition, and nonconstituent coordination. In: Richard Oehrle E.B., Wheeler D. (eds) Categorial grammars and natural language structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 153-198
22. C. Féry K. Hartmann 2005 The focus and prosodic structures of German gapping and right node raising The Linguistic Review 22 69 116
23. L.R. Gleitman 1965 Coordinating conjunctions in English Language 41 260 293
24. Goodall G. (1987) Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives, and restructuring. Cambridge University Press, New York
25. Grevisse, M. (1986 [1936]). Le Bon usage. Gembloux: Duculot. Revised by André Goosse.
26. Gundel, J. (2003). Information structure and referential givenness/newness: How much belongs in the grammar? In S. Mü ller (Ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG-2003 Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing (pp. 122-142). Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications. stanford.edu/HPSG/4.
27. Haji-Abdolhosseini, M. (2003). A constraint-based approach to information structure and prosody correspondence. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG-2003 Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing (pp. 143-162). Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications. stanford.edu/HPSG/4/.
28. J. Hankamer 1973 Unacceptable ambiguity Linguistic Inquiry 4 17 28
29. Hartmann K. (2000) Right node raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam
30. Hayes B. (1989) The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In: Kiparsky P., Youmans G. (eds) Rythm and meter. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 201-260
31. Höhle T. (1991) On reconstruction and coordination. In: Haider H., Netter K. (eds) Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, studies in natural language and linguistic theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 139-197
32. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
33. L. Horn 2002 Ellipsis and discourse coherence Sophia Linguistica 49 1 64
34. Horn L. et al (2005) An un-paper for the unsyntactician. In: Ufwene S.M. (eds) Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley's legacy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 329-365
35. Huddleston R.D., Payne J., Peterson P. (2002) Coordination and supplementation. In: Huddleston R.D., Pullum G. K. (eds) The Cambridge grammar of the English language, Chap 15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1273-1362
36. R. Hudson 1976 Conjunction reduction, gapping, and right-node-raising Language 52 535 562
37. Ingria, R. J. P. (1990). The limits of unification. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 194-204). Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
38. Inkelas S., Zec D. (1990) Prosodically constrained syntax. In: Inkelas S., Zec D. (eds) The phonology-syntax connection. University of Chicago Press, Stanford: CSLI & Chicago, Cambridge, pp 365-378
39. Jackendoff R. (1977) X-Syntax: A study of phrase structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge
40. Johannessen J. (1998) Coordination. Oxford University Press, NY
41. Kathol, A. (1995). Linearization-based German syntax. PhD Thesis, Ohio State University.
42. Kathol A. (2000) Linear syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Kayne R. (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Koenig J.-P. (1999) Lexical relations. CSLI Publications, Stanford
45. Krieger H.-U., Nerbonne J. (1993) Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In: Briscoe T., Paiva V., Copestake A. (eds) Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 90-136
46. Kuhn, J. (1996). An underspecified HPSG representation for information structure. In J. Tsuji (Ed.), Proceedings of Coling-96. 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96). Copenhagen, Denmark, August 5-9, 1996 (pp. 670-675). Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerst, New Jersey.
47. Lapointe, S. (1997). A lexical analysis of the English auxiliary verb system. In GLOT (pp. 2, 215-254).
48. R. Levine 1985 Right node (non-)raising Linguistic Inquiry 16 492 497
49. R.D. Levine 2001 The extraction riddle: Just what are we missing? Journal of Linguistics 37 145 174
50. McCawley J.D. (1987) Some additional evidence for discontinuity. In: Huck G.J., Ojeda A.E. (eds) Syntax and semantics 20: Discontinuous constituency. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 185-200
51. McCawley J.D. (1988) The syntactic phenomena of English (2 ed). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
52. Milward, D. (1990). Coordination in an axiomatic grammar. In COLING, (pp. 207-212). August 20-25, Helsinki, Finland.
53. W. Müller 1990 Die real existierenden grammatischen Ellipsen und die Norm. Eine Bestandsaufnahme Sprachwissenschaft 15 241 366
54. Neijt A. (1979) Gapping. Foris, Dordrecht
55. Nespor M. (1985) The phonological word in Italian. In: van der Hulst H., Smith N. (eds) Advances in nonlinear phonology. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp 193-204
56. Nespor M., Vogel I. (1986) Prosodic phonology. Foris, Dordrecht
57. G. Nunberg T. Wasow I.A. Sag 1994 Idioms Language 70 3 491 538
58. Orgun, C. O. (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
59. Pollard C., Sag I.A. (1987) Information-based syntax and semantics; volume one fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes No. 13. CSLI Publications, Stanford
60. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; Stanford: CSLI.
61. Pollard, C. J., Kasper, R. T., & Levine, R. D. (1994). Studies in constituent ordering: Toward a theory of linearization. In Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Research Proposal to the National Science Foundation.
62. Postal P.M. (1974) On raising. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
63. P.M. Postal 1994 Parasitic and pseudoparasitic gaps Linguistic Inquiry 25 63 117
64. Postal P.M. (1998) Three investigations of extraction. MIT, Cambridge, MA
65. G.K. Pullum A.M. Zwicky 1986 Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict Language 72 751 773
66. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman, Harcourt
67. Reape M. (1994) Domain union and word order variation in German. In: Nerbonne J., Netter K., Pollard C. J. (eds) German in head-driven phrase structure grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes, number 46. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 151-197
68. Reinhard, S. (2001). Deverbale Komposita an der Morphologie-Syntax- Semantik-Schnittstelle: ein HPSG-Ansatz. Philosophische dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
69. S.Z. Riehemann 1998 Type-based derivational morphology Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2 49 77
70. Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT. (Published in 1986 as Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.)
71. Ross J.R. (1970) Gapping and the order of constituents. In: Bierwisch M., Heidolph K. (eds) Progress in linguistics. Mouton, The Hague, pp 249-259
72. J. Sabbagh 2007 Ordering and linearizing rightward movement Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 2 349 401
73. Sag, I. A. (1976). Deletion and logical form. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published in 1980 by New York: Garland Press.
74. Sag I.A., Wasow T., Bender E.M. (2003) Syntactic theory A formal introduction (2nd ed). CSLI Publications, Stanford
75. E. Selkirk 1986 On derived domains in sentence phonology Phonology Yearbook 3 371 405
76. Selkirk E.O. (1982) The syntax of words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
77. Siegel, D. (1974). Topics in English morphology. MIT Dissertation.
78. Simpson, J. (1983). Aspects of Warlpiri morphology and syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
79. Simpson J. (1991) Warlpiri morpho-syntax: A lexicalist approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht
80. Smith G. (2000) Word remnants and coordination. In: Thieroff R., Tamrat M., Fuhrhop N., Teuber O. (eds) Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis. Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp 57-68
81. Strauss S.L. (1982) Lexicalist phonology of English and German. Foris, Dordrecht
82. M. Suñer 1975 Spanish adverbs: Support for the phonological cycle? Linguistic Inquiry 6 602 605
83. Toman J. (1985) A discussion of coordination and word-syntax. In: Jindřrich T. (eds) Studies in German grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 407-432
84. S. Torner 2005 On the morphological nature of Spanish adverbs ending in -mente Probus 17 1 115 144
85. Trost, H. (1993). Coping with derivation in a morphological component. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 368- 376). Utrecht.
86. Vergnaud J.-R. (1974). French relative clauses, Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge MA, MIT
87. Vigário M. (2003) The prosodic word in European portuguese. Interface Explorations 6. Mouton de Gruyter, Berline, Newyork
88. M. Vigário S. Frota 2002 Prosodic word deletion in coordinate structures Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1 2 241 264
89. Wesche B. (1995) Symmetric coordination. An alternative theory of phrase structure. Niemeyer Verlag, Tüebingen
90. Wexler K., Culicover P. (1980) Formal principles of language acquisition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
91. Wiese R. (1992) Prosodic phonology and its role in the processing of written language. In: Görz G. (eds) Computing meaning, Konvens 92: 1. Konferenz "Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache". Springer, Berlin, pp 139-148
92. Wiese R. (1996) The phonology of German. Oxford University Press, Oxford
93. Wilcock G. et al (2005) Information structure and minimal recursion semantics. In: Arppa A. (eds) Inquiries into words, constraints and contexts: Festschrift for Kimmo Koskenniemi on his 60th Birthday, CSLI Studies in Computational Linguistics ONLINE. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 268-277
94. Wilder C. (1997) Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In: Alexiadou A., Hall T.A. (eds) Studies on universal grammar and typological variation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 59-107
95. Yatabe, S. (2001). The syntax and semantics of left-node raising in Japanese. In D. Flickinger, & A. Kathol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 325-344). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/ HPSG/1/.
96. Zaenen, A., & Karttunen, L. (1984). Morphological non-distinctness and coordination. In ESCOL 83 (pp. 309-320).
97. Zwicky, A. M. (1986). The unaccented pronoun constraint in English. In: A. M. Zwicky (Ed.), Interfaces, volume 32 of Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 100-114). Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.