Role of dorsal and ventral stream development in biological motion perception

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 18, 2008, Pages 1763-1767

  Lichtensteiger, Janine ^a   Loenneker, Thomas ^a,b   Bucher, Kerstin ^a   Martin, Ernst ^a,b   Klaver, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biological motion perception; Children; Development; Functional MRI; Ventral and dorsal stream

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHILD; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57149142641     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328318ede3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blake R, Turner LM, Smoski MJ, Pozdol SL, Stone WL. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychol Sci 2003; 14:151-157.
2. Pavlova M, Staudt M, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N, Krageloh-Mann I. Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early peri ventricular brain lesions. Brain 2003; 126:692-701.
3. Pavlova M, Krageloh-Mann I, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N. Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception 2001; 30:925-933.
4. Freire A, Lewis TL, Maurer D, Blake R. The development of sensitivity to biological motion in noise. Perception 2006; 35:647-657.
5. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Haxby JV, Martin A. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:991-1001.
6. Grossman E, Donnelly M, Price R, Pickens D, Morgan V, Neighbor C, et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12:711-720.
7. Vaina LM, Solomon J, Chowdhury S, Sinha P, Belliveau JW. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:11656-11661.
8. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW editors. Analysis of visual behaviour. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1982. pp. 549-586.
9. Giese MA. A neural model for biological movement recognition: a neurophysiologically plausible theory. In: Vaina LM, Breadsley SA, Rushton S editors. Optic flow and beyond (Synthese Library). Norwell, Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. pp. 443-470.
10. Carter EJ, Pelphrey KA. School-age children exhibit domain-specific responses to biological motion. Soc Neurosci 2006; 1:396-411.
11. Mosconi MW, Mack PB, McCarthy G, Pelphrey KA. Taking an 'intentional stance' on eye-gaze shifts: a functional neuroimaging study of social perception in children. Neuroimage 2005; 27:247-252.
12. Gathers AD, Bhatt R, Corbly CR, Farley AB, Joseph JE. Developmental shifts in cortical loci for face and object recognition. Neuroreport 2004; 15:1549-1553.
13. Passarotti AM, Smith J, DeLano M, Huang J. Developmental differences in the neural bases of the face inversion effect show progressive tuning of face-selective regions to the upright orientation. Neuroimage 2007; 34:1708-1722.
14. Klaver P, Lichtenstejger J, Bucher K, Dietrich T, Loenneker T, Martin E. Dorsal stream development in motion and structure-from-motion perception. Neuroimage 2008; 39:1815-1823.
15. Bucher K, Dietrich T, Marcar VL, Brem S, Halder P, Boujraf S, et al. Maturation of luminance- and motion-defined form perception beyond adolescence: a combined ERP and fMRI study. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 1625-1636.
16. Gunn A, Cory E, Atkinson J, Braddick O, Wattam-Bell J, Guzzetta A, et al. Dorsal and ventral stream sensitivity in normal development and hemiplegia. Neuroreport 2002; 13:843-847.
17. Vanrie J, Verfaillie K. Perception of biological motion: a stimulus set of human point-light actions. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004; 36:625-629.
18. Kang HC, Burgund ED, Lugar HM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL. Comparison of functional activation foci in children and adults using a common stereotactic space. Neuroimage 2003; 19:16-28.
19. Gilmore RO, Johnson MH. Learning what is where: oculomotor contributions to the development of spatial cognition. In: Simion F, Butterworth G editors. The development of sensory, motor and cognitive capacities in early infancy: from sensation to cognition. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press; 1998. pp. 25-47.
20. Giaschi D, Regan D. Development of motion-defined figure-ground segregation in preschool and older children, using a letter-identification task. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74:761-767.