Spatial predictions of Baltic phytobenthic communities: Measuring robustness of generalized additive models based on transect data

Journal of Marine Systems

Volumn 74, Issue SUPPL., 2008, Pages

  Sandman, Antonia ^a   Isaeus, Martin ^b   Bergström, Ulf ^c   Kautsky, Hans ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b AquaBiota Water Research   (Sweden)

^c Institute of Coastal Research   (Sweden)

Author keywords

AIC; Cross selection; GAM; Line transects; Phytobenthic species; Spatial distribution

Indexed keywords

AIC; CROSS-SELECTION; GAM; LINE TRANSECTS; PHYTOBENTHIC SPECIES; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

ECOSYSTEM MODELING; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MODEL VALIDATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHYTOBENTHOS; PREDICTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ALGAE;

EID: 57149117993     PISSN: 09247963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Austin M.P. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200 1-2 (2007) 1-19
2. Austin M.P., and Meyers J.A. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 85 1-3 (1996) 95-106
3. Berger R., Malm T., and Kautsky L. Two reproductive strategies in Baltic Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae). European Journal of Phycology 36 3 (2001) 265-273
4. Burnham K.P., and Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York 488
5. Cato I., Kjellin B., and Zetterlund S. Förekomst och utbredning av sandbankar, berg och hårdbottnar inom svenskt territorialvatten och svensk ekonomisk zon (EEZ). SGU Rapport 2003:1 (2003), Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning (SGU), Uppsala
6. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudík M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., Li J., Lohmann L.G., Loiselle B.A., Manion G., Moritz C., Nakamura M., Nakazawa Y., Overton J.McC., Peterson A.T., Phillips S.J., Richardson K.S., Scachetti-Pereira R., Schapire R.E., Sobero'n J., Williams S., Wisz M.S., and Zimmermann N.E. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29 2 (2006) 129-151
7. Engkvist R., Malm T., and Tobiasson S. Density dependent grazing effects of the isopod Idotea baltica Pallas on Fucus vesiculosus L in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Ecology 34 3 (2000) 253-260
8. Eriksson B.K., and Bergström L. Local distribution patterns of macroalgae in relation to environmental variables in the northern Baltic Proper. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 62 (2005) 109-117
9. Guisan A., and Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8 9 (2005) 993-1009
10. Isaeus, M., 2004. Factors structuring Fucus communities at open and complex coastlines in the Baltic Sea. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
11. Jansson A.-M., and Kautsky N. Quantitative survey of hard bottom communities in a Baltic archipelago. In: Keegan B.F., and Boaden P.J.S. (Eds). Biology of Benthic Organisms (1977), Pergamon, New York 359-366
12. Kautsky L. Life strategies of aquatic soft bottom macrophytes. Oikos 53 1 (1988) 126-135
13. Kautsky H. Quantitative distribution of sublittoral plant and animal communities along the Baltic Sea gradient. In: Eleftheriou A., Ansell A.D., and Smith C.J. (Eds). Biology and Ecology of Shallow Coastal Waters (Proc. 28th Europ. Mar. Biol. Symp., Crete) (1995), Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark 23-30
14. Kautsky L., and Kautsky H. Algal species diversity and dominance along gradients of stress and disturbance in marine environments. Vegetatio 83 (1989) 259-267
15. Kautsky H., and van der Maarel E. Multivariate approaches to the variation in phytobenthic communities and environmental vectors in the Baltic Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 60 (1990) 169-184
16. Kuha J. AIC and BIC. Comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods & Research 33 2 (2004) 188-229
17. Larsson U. Himmerfjärden eutrophication study (2007). http://www2.ecology.su.se/dbhfj/index.htm WWW Page, http://www2.ecology.su.se/dbhfj/index.htm
18. Lehmann A., Overton J.McC., and Leathwick J.R. GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial predictions. Ecological Modelling 157 1-2 (2002) 189-207
19. Maggini R., Lehmann A., Zimmermann N., and Guisan A. Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities. Journal of Biogeography 33 10 (2006) 1729-1749
20. Remane A., and Schlieper C. Biology of Brackish Water (1971), John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York 372
21. Snoeijs P. Marine and brackish waters. In: Rydin H., Snoeijs P., and Diekmann M. (Eds). Swedish Plant Geography: Dedicated to Eddy van der Maarel on his 65th birthday. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 94 (1999) 1-248
22. Worm B., Lotze H.K., and Sommer U. Algal propagule banks modify competition, consumer and resource control on Baltic rocky shores. Oecologia 128 2 (2001) 281-293
23. Zhang L., Gove J.H., and Heath L.S. Spatial residual analysis of six modeling techniques. Ecological Modelling 186 2 (2005) 154-177
24. Zweig M.H., and Campbell G. Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry 39 4 (1993) 561-577