Stakeholders' views of legal and advice services for people admitted to psychiatric hospital

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 219-232

  Campbell, James ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Compulsory mental health; Law; Legal and advice services

Indexed keywords

EID: 57149116935     PISSN: 09649069     EISSN: 14699621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09649060802550659     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bindman, J., Maingay, S. and Szmuckler, G. (2003) The Human Rights Act and mental health legislation. British journal of psychiatry, 182, pp. 91-94.
2. Campbell, J. (1999) Mental health policy, care in the community and political conflict: The case of the integrated service in Northern Ireland. Outside the walls of the community, Athlone, London
3. Coates, J. W. (2004) Mental health review tribunals and legal representation - equality of arms?. Psychiatric bulletin, 24, p. 426.
4. Coid, J. and Maden, T. (2003) Should psychiatrists protect the public?. BMJ, 326, pp. 406-407.
5. Crossley, B. (2004) Mental health review tribunals: Recent problems. Psychiatric bulletin, 28, p. 384.
6. Department of Health (DoH) (2008) Implications of the Mental Health Act 2007: Transitional arrangements, DoH, London
7. Davidson, G., McCallion, M. and Potter, M. (2003) Connecting mental health and human rights, Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, Belfast
8. Eagleson, P. and Hunter, M. D. (2002) Improving the quality of reports to mental health review tribunals. Psychiatric Bulletin, 26:6, pp. 215-218.
9. Eastman, N. (1995) Anti-therapeutic community mental health law. British medical journal, 310, pp. 1081-1082.
10. Fawcett, B. (2007) Consistencies and inconsistencies: Mental health, compulsory treatment and community capacity building in England, Wales and Australia. British journal of social work, 37:6, pp. 1027-1042.
11. Ferencz, N. and McGuire, J. (2000) Mental health review Tribunals in the UK: Applying a therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Court review, pp. 48-52.
12. Ginath, Y. (1993) 'Who is to protect the rights of hospitalized mental patients?. Medicine and law, 12:3, pp. 287-290.
13. Gregory, P. (2000) Who can best protect patients' rights?. Psychiatric bulletin, 24:10, pp. 366-367.
14. Hatfield, B. and Antcliff, V. (2001) Detention under the Mental Health Act: Balancing rights, risks and needs for services. Journal of social welfare and family law, 32:3, pp. 135-153.
15. Henderson, J. (2002) Experiences of 'care' in mental health. The journal of adult protection, 4:3, pp. 34-45.
16. HMSO (1986) The Mental Health (NI) Order, 1986, HMSO, London
17. Huxley, P. and Thornicroft, G. (2003) Social inclusion, social quality and mental illness. British journal of psychiatry, 182, pp. 289-290.
18. Lawton-Smith, T. (2006) Community-based compulsory treatment orders in Scotland: The early evidence, King's Fund, London
19. Lodge, G. J. (2005) Making your case to the mental health review tribunal in England and Wales. Psychiatric bulletin, 29:4, pp. 149-151.
20. Macgregor-Morris, R., Ewbank, J. and Birmingham, L. (2001) Potential impact of the Human Rights Act on psychiatric practice: The best of British values. British medical journal, 322, pp. 848-850.
21. Manktelow, R., Hughes, P., Britton, F., Campbell, J., Hamilton, B. and Wilson, G. (2002) The experience and practice of approved social workers in Northern Ireland. British journal of social work, 32, pp. 443-461.
22. Mayor, S. (2002) High Court rules that delays breach the rights of detained psychiatric patients. British medical journal, 324, p. 1058.
23. Naeem, A., Gupta, B., Rutherford, J., Gachen, A. and Roberts, S. (2007) The simulated mental health review tribunal - a valuable training tool for senior house officers?. Psychiatric bulletin, 31, pp. 29-32.
24. O'Hagan, M. (1996) Two accounts of mental distress. Speaking our minds: an anthology of personal experiences on mental distress and its consequences, pp. 44-50. Macmillan, Basingstoke
25. O'Muirithe, B. and Shankar, R. (2008) An audit of the quality of reports to mental health review tribunals. Medicine, science and the law, 48:3, pp. 221-224.
26. Marriott, S., Audini, B., Lelliot, P., Webb, Y. and Duffet, R. (2001) Research into the Mental Health Act: A qualitative study of the views of those using or affected by it. Journal of mental health, 10:1, pp. 33-39.
27. Mental Health Commission for Ireland (MHC) (2008) Report on operation of Part 2 of the Mental Health Act 2001, Dublin, MHC
28. Peay, J. (2003) Decisions and dilemmas: Working with mental health law, Hart, Oxford
29. Perkins, E. (2003) Decision-making in mental health review tribunals, Central, London
30. Philo, G., Secker, J., Platt, S., Henderson, L., McLaughlin, G. and Burnside, J. (1994) The impact of the mass media on public images of mental illness: Media content and audience belief. Health education journal, 53, pp. 271-281.
31. Rapaport, J. and Manthorpe, J. (2008) Family matters: Developments concerning the role of the nearest relative and social worker under mental health law in England and Wales. British journal of social work, 38:6, pp. 1115-1131.
32. Reilly, S., Challis, D., Donnelly, M., Hughes, J. and Stewart, K. (2007) Care management in mental health services in England and Northern Ireland: Do integrated organizations promote integrated practice?. Journal of health services research and policy, 12:4, pp. 236-241.
33. Richardson, G. and Machin, D. (2000) Doctors on tribunals: A confusion of roles. British journal of psychiatry, 176, pp. 110-115.
34. Rogers, A. and Pilgrim, D. (2005) A sociology of mental health and illness. OU Press, Maidenhead
35. Rooth, G. (2001) The future (or not) of the medical member: An aspect of the 1983 Mental Health Act Review. Psychiatric bulletin, 25:1, pp. 8-9.
36. Rose, D. (2001) Users' voices: The perspectives of mental health service users on community and hospital care, Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, London
37. Taylor, P. J., Goldberg, E., Leese, M., Butwell, M. and Reed, A. (1999) Limits to the value of mental health review tribunal for offender patients: Suggestions for reform. British journal of pPsychiatry, 174, pp. 164-169.