Context-sensitive cut, copy, and paste

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 273, Issue , 2008, Pages 159-166

  Kerr, Reid ^a   Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Context sensitive code; Copy; Cut; Development environment code development; Paste; Programming errors

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; INFORMATION THEORY; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES;

CONTEXT SENSITIVE CODE; CUT; DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT CODE DEVELOPMENT; PASTE; PROGRAMMING ERRORS;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 57149116559     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1370256.1370283     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. P. Andritsos, V. Tzerpos. Software clustering based on information loss minimization. Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 334-344, 2003.
2. W. Cohen, Y. Singer. Context-sensitive learning methods for text categorization. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 17(2): 141-173, 1999
3. W. Griswold, D. Notkin. Computer-aided vs. manual program restructuring. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 17, no. 1, pages 33-41, 1992.
4. W. Griswold, D. Notkin. Automated Assistance for Program Restructuring. ACM Trans, on Software Engineering and Methodology vol. 2, no. 3, pages 228-269, 1993.
5. R. Holmes, G. Murphy. Using structural context to recommend source code examples. In Conference on Software engineering, 117-125, 2005.
6. M. Kim, L. Bergman, T. Lau, D. Notkin. An Ethnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices In OOPL. In Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 83-92, 2004.
7. M. Kim, D. Notkin. Using a Clone Genealogy Extractor for Understanding and Supporting Evolution of Code Clones. In Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, 17-21, 2004.
8. A. Ko, H. Aung, B. Myers. Eliciting Design Requirements for Maintenance-Oriented IDEs: A Detailed Study of Corrective and Perfective Maintenance Tasks. In CHI '05 extended abstracts, 1557-1560, 2005.
9. K. Kukich. Techniques for automatically correcting words in text. ACM Comput. Surv., 24(4):377-439, 1992.
10. B. Lange, T. Moher. Some strategies of reuse in an object-oriented programming environment. In CHI '89, 69-73, 1989.
11. T. Lethbridge, N. Anquetil. Comparative study of clustering algorithms and abstract representations for software remodularization. IEE Software, 150(3):185-201, 2003.
12. S. Mancoridis, B. Mitchell, Y. Chen, E. Gansner, Bunch: A clustering tool for the recovery and maintenance of software system structures. In Conference on Software Maintenance, pg. 50, 1999.
13. R. Miller. Lightweight Structure in Text. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, CMU, May 2002.
14. M. Rosson, J. Carroll. The Reuses of Uses in Smalltalk Programming. ACM Trans, on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(3), 219-253, 1996.
15. V. Sazawal, M. Kim, D. Notkin. A Study of Evolution in the Presence of Source-Derived Partial Design Representations. Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, 21-30, 2004.
16. G. Wallace, R. Biddle, E. Tempero. Smarter Cut-and-Paste for Programming Text Editors. Australasian User Interface Conference, 56-63, 2001.