Re: Perineal Approach for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Appears to Control Male Stress Incontinence Better Than the Transscrotal Approach. G. D. Henry, S. M. Graham, M. A. Cleves, C. J. Simmons and B. Flynn J Urol 2008; 179: 1475-1479

Journal of Urology

Volumn 181, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 417-418

  Siegel, Andrew ^a  

^a HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLADDER SPHINCTER PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERINEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA;

HUMANS; MALE; PERINEUM; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SCROTUM; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URINARY SPHINCTER, ARTIFICIAL; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MALE;

EID: 57149103677     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.048     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Wilson S.K., Delk J.R., Henry G.D., and Siegel A.L. New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 169 (2003) 261
2. Wilson S.K. AMS Sphincter 800™ Surgical Implant (2002), American Medical Systems, West Minnetonka, Minnesota