Approximate image-based tree-modeling using particle flows

Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Neubert, Boris ^a   Franken, Thomas ^a   Deussen, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Botanics; Image based modeling; Plant models

Indexed keywords

BOTANICS; IMAGE BASED MODELING; IMAGE INFORMATION; PARTICLE FLOWS; PLANT MODELS; 3D FLOW SIMULATIONS; 3D TREE MODELS; APPROXIMATE IMAGES; BOTANIES; BRANCHING ANGLES; BRANCHING STRUCTURES; DENSITY VALUES; FIRST ORDERS; IMAGE INFORMATIONS; IMAGE-BASED MODELING; INITIAL POSITIONS; PARTICLE SIMULATIONS; USER INTERVENTIONS;

GEOMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; SET THEORY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; USER INTERFACES; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FLOW SIMULATION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

IMAGE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 57149102330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1275808.1276487     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. CHODOROWSKI, A., MATTSSON, U., LANGILLE, M., AND HAMARNEH, G. 2005. Color lesion boundary detection using live wire. In Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing vol. 5747, 1589-1596.
2. DE REFFYE, P., EDELIN, C., FRANCON, J., JAEGER, M., AND PUECH, C. 1988. Plant models faithful to botanical structure and development. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '88 Proc.), J. Dill, Ed., vol. 22. ACM SIGGRAPH, 151-158.
3. DEUSSEN, O., AND LINTERMANN, B. 2005. Digital Design of Nature - Computer Generated Plants and Organics. Springer-Verlag.
4. EBERT, D., MUSGRAVE, K., PEACHEY, P., PERLIN, K., AND WORLEY, S. 2003. Texturing and Modeling: A Procedural Approach. Morgan Kaufmman.
5. HOCKNEY, R. W., AND EASTWOOD, J. W. 1988. Computer Simulation using Particles. Taylor & Francis, Inc., Bristol, PA, USA.
6. HOLTON, M. 1994. Strands, gravity and botanical tree imagery. Computer Graphics Forum 13, 1, 57-67.
7. IJIRI, T., OWADA, S., OKABE, M., AND IGARASHI, T. 2005. Floral diagrams and inflorescences: interactive flower modeling using botanical structural constraints. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 3, 720-726.
8. LINTERMANN, B., AND DEUSSEN, O. 1999. Interactive modeling of plants. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19, 1, 56-65.
9. MAX, N. 1995. Optical models for direct volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1, 2, 99-108.
10. MĚCH, R., AND PRUSINKIEWICZ, P. 1996. Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conf. Proc., ACM SIGGRAPH, 397-410.
11. OKABE, M., OWADA, S., AND IGARASHI, T. 2005. Interactive design of botanical trees using freehand sketches and example-based editing. Computer Graphics Forum 24, 3, 487-496.
12. OPPENHEIMER, P. 1986. Real time design and animation of fractal plants and trees. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 86 Conf. Proc.), vol. 20, 55-64.
13. PÉREZ, P., GANGNET, M., AND BLAKE, A. 2003. Poisson image editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3 (July), 313-318.
14. PRESS, W. H., TEUKOLSKY, S. A., VETTERLING, W. T., AND FLANNERY, B. P. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press.
15. PRUSINKIEWICZ, P., AND LINDENMAYER, A. 1990. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. PRUSINKIEWICZ, P., HAMMEL, M. S., AND MJOLSNESS, E. 1993. Animation of plant development. Computers Graphics (SIGGRAPH 93 Conf. Proc.), 351-360.
17. PRUSINKIEWICZ, P., MÜNDERMANN, L., KARWOWSKI, R., AND LANE, B. 2002. The use of positional information in the modelling of plants. In SIGGRAPH 2001 Conf. Proc., 289-300.
18. QUAN, L., TAN, P., ZENG, G., YUAN, L., WANG, J., AND KANG, S. B. 2006. Image-based plant modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25. 3 (July), 599-604.
19. RECHE-MARTINEZ, A., MARTIN, I., AND DRETTAKIS, G. 2004. Volumetric reconstruction and interactive rendering of trees from photographs. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 720-727.
20. REEVES, W., AND BLAU, R. 1985. Approximate and probabilistic algorithms for shading and rendering structured particle systems. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '85 Conf. Proc.). vol. 19, 313-322.
21. REEVES, W. 1983. Particle systems - a technique for modeling a class of fuzzy objects. Computer Graphics 17, 3, 359-376.
22. RODKAEW, Y., CHONGSTITVATANA, P., SIRIPANT, S., AND LURSINSAP, C. 2003. Particle systems for plant modeling. In Plant Growth Modeling and Applications. 210-217.
23. RUZON, M., AND TOMASI, C. 2000. Alpha estimation in natural images. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Volume I, 18-25.
24. SABELLA, P. 1988. A rendering algorithm for visualizing 3D scalar fields. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 88 Conf. Proc.), 51-58.
25. SHLYAKHTER, I., ROZENOER, M., DORSEY, J., AND TELLER, S. 2001. Reconstructing 3D tree models from instrumented photographs. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 53-61.
26. SUN, J., JIA, J., TANG, C., AND SHUM, H. 2004. Poisson matting. ACM Transactions on Graphics 23. 3 (July), 315-321.
27. VIENNOT, X., EYROLLES, G., JANEY, N., AND ARQUÉS, D. 1989. Combinatorial analysis of ramified patterns and computer imagery of trees. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '89 Conf. Proc.), vol. 23, 31-40.
28. WEBER, J., AND PENN, J. 1995. Creation and rendering of realistic trees. In SIGGRAPH 95 Conf. Proc., 119-128.
29. WITKIN, A., AND BARAFF, D., 1997. Physically based modeling: Principles and practice. Siggraph '97 Course notes.