A comparison of imaging conditions for wave-equation shot-profile migration

Geophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2008, Pages

  Schleicher, Jörg ^a   Costa, Jessé C ^b   Novais, Amélia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION;

CROSS CORRELATIONS; ILLUMINATION COMPENSATION; IMAGING CONDITIONS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; SHOT PROFILE MIGRATION; VELOCITY MODEL; WAVEFIELDS;

WAVE EQUATIONS;

AMPLITUDE; AUTOCORRELATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECONVOLUTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC METHOD; SEISMIC MIGRATION; VELOCITY PROFILE; WAVE EQUATION; WAVE FIELD;

EID: 57149098793     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2976776     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arienti, M. T., E. Bonomi, G. Cardone, and L. Cazzola, 2002, Amplitude-preserving Monte Carlo 3D prestack migration: 64th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, B09: 1-4.
2. Bagaini, C., E. Bonomi, and E. Pieroni, 1995, Split convolutional approach to 3D depth extrapolation: 65th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 195-198.
3. Bleistein, N., 2007, On stabilizing Kirchhoff-type inversion formulas: Presented at the "Making Waves about Seismics" Workshop, WIT Consortium.
4. Chattopadhyay, S., and G. A. McMechan, 2008, Imaging conditions for prestack reverse-time migration: Geophysics, 73, no. 3, S81-S89. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2903822
5. Claerbout, J. F., 1971, Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping: Geophysics, 36, 467-481. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1440185
6. Gazdag, J., 1978, Wave equation migration with the phase-shift method: Geophysics, 43, 1342-1351. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1440899
7. 1980, Wave equation migration with the accurate space derivative method: Geophysical Prospecting, 28, 60-70. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/ j.1365-2478.1980.tb01211.x
8. Guitton, A., A. Valenciano, and D. Bevc, 2006, Robust imaging condition for shot profile migration: 76rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1059-1062.
9. Guitton, A., A. Valenciano, D. Bevc, and J. Claerbout, 2007, Smoothing imaging condition for shot profile migration: Geophysics, 72, no. 3, S149-S154. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2712113
10. Sava, P., and S. Fomel, 2006, Time-shift imaging condition on seismic migration: Geophysics, 71, no. 6, S209-S217. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2338824
11. Shin, C., S. Jang, and D. J. Min, 2001, Improved amplitude preservation for prestack depth migration by inverse scattering theory: Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 592-606. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1046/ j.1365-2478.2001.00279.x
12. Valenciano, A., and B. Biondi, 2003, 2D deconvolution imaging condition for shot profile migration: 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1059-1062.
13. Versteeg, R., 1994, The Marmousi experience: Velocity model determination on a synthetic complex data set: The Leading Edge, 13, 927-936. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.1437051
14. Zhang, Y., G. Zhang, and N. Bleistein, 2003, True amplitude wave equation migration arising from true amplitude one-way wave equations: Inverse Problems, 19, 1113-1138. inp INPEEY 0266-5611 10.1088/0266-5611/ 19/5/307
15. 2005, Theory of true-amplitude one-way wave equations and true-amplitude common-shot migration: Geophysics, 70, no. 4, E1-E10. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1988182