Volume measurement using the Polhemus FastSCAN 3D laser scanning: A novel application for burns clinical research

Journal of Burn Care and Research

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 994-1000

  Edgar, Dale ^a,b   Day, Rob ^b   Briffa, N Kathy ^c   Cole, Joan ^c   Wood, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; BURN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LASER; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SURVIVOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY; VOLUMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM INJURIES; BURNS; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 57149091560     PISSN: 1559047X     EISSN: 15590488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31818b9e97     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Montgomery RK. Pain management in burn injury. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2004;16:39-49.
2. Herndon DN, Morris SE, Coffey JA Jr, et al. The effect of mucosal integrity and mesenteric blood flow on enteric translocation of microorganisms in cutaneous thermal injury. Prog Clin Biol Res 1989;308:377-82.
3. Demling RH. The burn edema process: current concepts. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005;26:207-27.
4. Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther 2003;83: 134-45.
5. Meijer RS, Rietman JS, Geertzen JH, Bosmans JC, Dijkstra PU. Validity and intra- and inter-observer reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema. Lymphology 2004;37:127-33.
6. Mayrovitz HN, Sims N, Macdonald J. Assessment of limb volume by manual and automated methods in patients with limb edema or lymphedema. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000;13: 272-6.
7. Harrison JA, Nixon MA, Fright WR, Snape L. Use of hand held laser scanning in the assessment of facial swelling: a preliminary study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;42:8-17.
8. Day JS, Murdoch DJ, Dumas GA. Calibration of position and angular data from a magnetic tracking device. J Biomech 2000;33:1039-45.
9. Biryukova EV, Roby-Brami A, Frolov AA, Mokhtari M. Kinematics of human arm reconstructed from spatial tracking recordings. J Biomech 2000;33:985-95.
10. Polhemus I. Polhemus: innovation in morion; available from http:/www.polhemus.com/?page=Scanning-Case-Studies; accessed 3 Dec 2007.
11. Boland R, Adams R. Development and evaluation of a precision forearm and hand volumeter and measuring cylinder. J Hand Ther 1996;9:349-58.
12. Farrell K, Johnson A, Duncan H, Offenbacker T, Curry C. The intertester and intratester reliability of hand volumetrics. J Hand Ther 2003;16:292-9.
13. King TI II. The effect of water temperature on hand volume during volumetric measurement using the water displacement method. J Hand Ther 1993;6:202-4.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-60.
15. Fleiss J. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coeffieicnt in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990;20:337-40.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007;17:571-82.
18. Box RC, Reul-Hirche HM, Bullock-Saxton JE, Furnival CM. Clinical reliability of three measurement methods to monitor changes in arm size and volume. Paper presented at Australian Lymphoedema Association Conference, Adelaide, 2000.
19. Johansson S, Oberg T. Accuracy and precision of volumetric determinations using two commercial CAD systems for prosthetics: a technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998;35: 27-33.
20. Stanton AW, Northfield JW, Holroyd B, Mortimer PS, Levick JR. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer). Lymphology 1997;30:77-97.
21. Man IOW, Markland KL, Morrissey MC. The validity and reliability of the perometer in evaluating human knee volume. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2004;24:352-8.
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1084-7.