Optimized post-operative surveillance of permanent pacemakers by home monitoring: The OEDIPE trial

Europace

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1392-1399

  Halimi, Franck ^a   Clémenty, Jacques ^b   Attuel, Patrick ^a   Dessenne, Xavier ^c   Amara, Walid ^d  

^a Centre Medico Chirurgical   (France)

^b BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Clinique du Mousseau   (France)

^d Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil   (France)

Author keywords

Ambulatory monitoring; Pacemaker implantation; Telecardiology; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIZZINESS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEVER; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION DISTURBANCE; HEMATOMA; HOME MONITORING; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IMPLANTATION; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; SHORT FORM 36; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; SYNCOPE; TACHYCARDIA; TELECARDIOLOGY; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; FEMALE; FRANCE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE, POSTMARKETING; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REMOTE CONSULTATION;

EID: 57149089288     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: 15322092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eun250     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Wallbrück K, Stellbrink C, Santini M, Gill J, Hartmann A, Wunderlich E. The value of permanent follow-up of implantable pacemakers - first results of an European trial. Biomed Tech 2002;47:950-3.
2. Stellbrink C, Hartmann A, Igidbashian D, Jaswinder G, Wunderlich E, Santini M. Home monitoring for pacemaker therapy: intermediate results of the first European multicenter study. (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:686.
3. Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Santini M. Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization. Europace 2008;10:164-70.
4. Cleland JG, Louis AA, Rigby AS, Janssens U, Balk AH TEN-HMS Investigators. Noninvasive home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure at high risk of recurrent admission and death: the Trans-European Network - Home Care Management System (TEN-HMS) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1654-64.
5. Brugada P. What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up? Clin Res Cardiol 2006;95:III/3-9.
6. Ricci RP, Russo M, Santini M. Management of atrial fibrillation-what are the possibilities of early detection with home-monitoring? Clin Res Cardiol 2006;95:III/10-6.
7. Deharo JC, Djiane P. Home Monitoring: what can we expect in the future? Clin Res Cardiol 2006;95:III/36-9.
8. Fauchier L, Sadoul N, Kouakam C, Briand F, Chauvin M, Babuty D et al. Potential cost savings by telemedicine-assisted long-term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:S255-9.
9. Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Blanc JJ, Daubert JC, Drexler H, Ector H et al. European Society of Cardiology, European Heart Rhythm Association. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2007;9:959-98.
10. Riegel B, Carlson B, Kopp Z, LePetri B, Glaser D, Unger A. Effect of a standardized nurse case-management telephone intervention on resource use in patients with chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:705- 12.
11. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
12. Aggarwal RK, Connelly DT, Ray SG, Ball J, Charles RG. Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single 1chamber systems. Br Heart J 1995;73:571-5.
13. Irwin ME, Gulamhusein SS, Senaratne MP, St Clair WR. Outcomes of an ambulatory cardiac pacing program: indications, risks, benefits, and outcomes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:2027-31.
14. Lazarus A. Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:S2-12.