Soil magnetic susceptibility: A quantitative proxy of soil drainage for use in ecological restoration

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 657-667

  Grimley, David A ^a   Wang, Jing Shu ^b   Liebert, Derek A ^c   Dawson, Jeffrey O ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c Urbana Park District   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydric soils; Magnetic susceptibility; Plant adaptations; Restoration; Soil drainage

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PARENT MATERIAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFORESTATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SOIL DRAINAGE; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL PROPERTY;

ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ACER; ACER SACCHARINUM; CARYA ILLINOINENSIS; CARYA LACINIOSA; FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA; LIRIODENDRON; LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA; PRUNUS; PRUNUS SEROTINA; QUERCUS ALBA;

EID: 57049188360     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00479.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anand, R. R., and R. J. Gilkes. 1984. Mineralogical and chemical properties of weathered magnetite grains from lateritic saprolite. Journal of Soil Science 35:559-567.
2. Armstrong, W., S. H. F. W. Justin, P. M., Beckett, and S. Lythe. 1991. Root adaptation to soil waterlogging. Aquatic Botany 39:57-73.
3. Arruda, N. K. 2003. Using magnetic susceptibility to delineate hydric soils: Evidence for magnetic particle dissolution. Masters thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
4. Bell, D. T., and F. L. Johnson. 1974. Flood-caused tree mortality around Illinois reservoirs. Transactions, Illinois State Academy of Science 67:28-37.
5. Blom, C. W. P. M., G. M. Bögemann, P. Laan, A. J. M. van der Sman, H. M. van de Steeg, and L. A. C. J. Voesenek. 1990. Adaptions to flooding in plants from river areas. Aquatic Botany 38:29-47.
6. de Jong, E., D. J. Pennock, and P. A. Nestor. 2000. Magnetic susceptibility of soils in different slope positions in Saskatchewan, Canada. Catena 40:291-305.
7. Grimley, D. A., and N. K. Arruda. 2007. Observations of magnetite dissolution in poorly drained soils. Soil Science 172:968-982.
8. Grimley, D. A., N. K. Arruda, and M. W. Bramstedt. 2004. Using magnetic susceptibility to facilitate more rapid, reproducible and precise delineation of hydric soils in the Midwestern USA. Catena 58:183-213.
9. Grimley, D. A., and M. J. Vepraskas. 2000. Magnetic susceptibility for use in delineating hydric soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:2174-2180.
10. Hailiang, D., J. K. Frederickson, D. W. Kennedy, J. M. Zachara, R. K. Kukkadapu, and T. C. Onstott. 2000. Mineral transformation associated with the microbial reduction of magnetite. Chemical Geology 169:299-318.
11. Hanesch, M., and R. Scholger. 2005. The influence of soil type on the magnetic susceptibility measured throughout soil profiles. Geophysical Journal International 161:50-56.
12. Hoffmann, V., M. Knab, and E. Appel. 1999. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of roadside pollution. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 66:313-326.
13. Hook, D. D., J. B. Baker, S. G. Boyce, S. G. Carpenter, T. W. Daniel, R. F. Fisher, et al. 1984. Forest ecology. Pages 1-63 in K. F. Wenger, editor. Forestry handbook. 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
14. Kapicka, A., E. Petrovsky, S. Ustjak, and K. Machachova. 1999. Proxy mapping of fly-ash pollution of soils around a coal-burning power plant: a case study in the Czech Republic. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 66:291-297.
15. Kostka, J. E., and K. H. Nealson. 1995. Dissolution and reduction of magnetite by bacteria. Environmental Science & Technology 29:2535-2540.
16. Kozlowski, T. T. 2002. Physiological-ecological impacts of flooding on riparian forest ecosystems. Wetlands 22:550-561.
17. Maher, B. A. 1986. Characterization of soils by mineral magnetic measurements. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 42:76-92.
18. Maher, B. A. 1998. Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary loessic paleosols: Paleoclimatic implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 137:25-54.
19. Mount, H. R. 1982. Soil survey of Champaign County, Illinois. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Washington, D.C.
20. Mullins, C. E. 1977. Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science-a review. Journal of Soil Science 28:223-246.
21. Pezeshki, S. R. 1993. Differences in patterns of photosynthetic responses to hypoxia in flood-tolerant and flood-sensitive tree species. Photosynthetica 28:423-430.
22. Pezeshki, S. R., and R. D. DeLaune. 1998. Responses of seedlings of selected woody species to soil oxidation-reduction conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 40:123-133.
23. Teskey, R. O., and T. M. Hinckley. 1977. Impact of water level changes on woody riparian and wetland communities: 1. plant and soil responses; 3. the central forest region. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia, Missouri.
24. USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service). 1998. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States, Version 4.0. In G. W. Hurt et al., editors. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service, Fort Worth, Texas.
25. USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States, Version 6.0. In G. W. Hurt and L. M. Vasilas, editors. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska.
26. Vadyunina, A. F., and V. F. Babanin. 1972. Magnetic susceptibility of some soils in the U.S.S.R. Soviet Soil Science 4:588-599.
27. Wacker, C. E. 1996. Soil survey of Vermilion County, Illinois. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Washington, D.C.
28. Wallace, P. M., D. M. Kent, and D. R. Rich. 1996. Responses of wetland tree species to hydrology and soils. Restoration Ecology 4:33-41.
29. Wang, J.-S. 2005. Amino sugar-nitrogen and magnetic susceptibility as proxies for tree interactions with soil. Master thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
30. Watson, M. 2002. The use of magnetic susceptibility measurements to delineate wetlands in KwaZula-Natal, South Africa. Masters thesis. University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
31. Williams, M. 1992. Evidence for the dissolution of magnetite in recent Scottish peats. Quaternary Research 37:171-182.
32. Williams, R. D., and J. R. Cooper. 1990. Locating soil boundaries using magnetic susceptibility. Soil Science 150:889-895.
33. Yu, J., S. Zhan, L. Wu, and T. Chu. 1986. The magnetic susceptibility of the soils in subtropical and tropical China. Acta Pedologica Sinica 23:50-56.