A series of papers for those yearning to propel telehealth to new heights

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 952-956

  Whitten, Pamela ^a   Holtz, Bree ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Applications; Deal makers breakers; Future of telemedicine; Midwest Alliance for Telehealth Technology Resource Center; Societal impacts

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

DEAL MAKERS/BREAKERS; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTS; FUTURE OF TELEMEDICINE; PRO-PEL; SOCIETAL IMPACTS; TELEHEALTH; WHITE PAPERS;

TELEMEDICINE;

MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SHORT SURVEY; TELEHEALTH; TELEMEDICINE;

COMMUNICATION; DISASTER PLANNING; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 57049178453     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0129     Document Type: Short Survey

References (18)

1. Whitten P, Davenport Sypher B. Evolution of telemedicine from an applied communication perspective in the United States. Telemed e-Health 2006;12:590-600.
2. Hersh W, Hickam D, Severance D, Dana T, Krages K, Helfand M. Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(suppl 2):3-31.
3. Hersh W, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shaprio S, Greenlick M. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: A systematic review. BMC Med Informatics Decision Making 2001;1(5).
4. Hersh W, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, et al. A systematic review of the efficacy of telemedicine for making decisions. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:197-209.
5. Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Roine R. Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessment of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10:318-324.
6. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. System review of evidence for the benefit of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:1-7.
7. Bensink M, Hailey D, Wootton R. A systematic review of success and failures in home telehealth: Preliminary results. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:8-16.
8. Whitten P, Mair F, Hatcox A, May C, Williams, T, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 2002;324:1434-1437.
9. Jennett PA, Affleck-Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D, Scott RE. The socioeconomic impact of telehealth: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9:311-320.
10. Whitten P, Kuwahara E. Telemedicine from the payor perspective: Considerations for reimbursement decisions. Dis Manage Outcomes 2003;11:291-298.
11. Shore J, Brooks E, Savin D, Manson S, Libby A. An economic evaluation of telehealth data collection with rural populations. Psychiatric Services 2007;58:830-835.
12. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320:1517-1520.
13. Mair F, Whiten P, May C, Doolittle G. Patients' perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6:36-40.
14. Gustke S, Balch D, West V, Rogers L. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemed J 2000;6:5-13.
15. Whitten P, Mair F. Telemedicine and patient satisfaction: Current status and future directions. Telemed e-Health 2000;6:417-423.
16. Whitten P, Doolittle G, Mackert M. Providers' acceptance of telehospice. J Palliat Med 2005;8:730-735.
17. Whitten P, Cook D, Doolittle G. An analysis of provider perceptions for telehospice. Am J Hospice Palliat Care 1998;15:267-275.
18. Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: Overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:294-300.