Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production

HortScience

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 2104-2111

  Rivard, Cary L ^a   Louws, Frank J ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial wilt; Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici; Fusarium wilt; Organic production; Ralstonia solanacearum

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FUSARIUM; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM;

EID: 57049173478     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2104     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abdelmageed, A.H.A., N. Gruda, and B. Geyer. 2004. Effects of temperature and grafting on the growth and development of tomato plants under controlled conditions. Deutscher Tropentag, Berlin, Germany, 5-7 Oct. 2004.
2. Adhikari, T.B. and R.C. Basnyat. 1998. Effect of crop rotation and cultivar resistance on bacterial wilt of tomato in Nepal. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 20:283-287.
3. Bergelson, J. and C.B. Purrington. 1996. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Amer. Naturalist 148:536-558.
4. Besri, M. 2001. New developments of alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of tomato soilborne pathogens in covered cultivation in a developing country, Morocco. 2001 Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, CA, 5-8 Nov. 2001.
5. Besri, M. 2003. Tomato grafting as an alternative to methyl bromide in Morocco. 2001 Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, CA, 3-6 Nov. 2003.
6. Black, L.L., D.L. Wu, J.F. Wang, T. Kalb, D. Abbass, and J.H. Chen. 2003. Grafting tomatoes for production in the hot-wet season. Asian Veg. Res. & Dev. Ctr. Bul. 03-551.
7. Bietsos, F.A. 2005. Use of grafting and calcium cyanamide as alternatives to methyl bromide soil fumigation and their effects on growth, yield, quality and fusarium wilt control in melon. J. Phytopathol. 153:155-161.
8. Brown, J.K.M. 2002. Yield penalties of disease resistance in crops. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:339-344.
9. Buddenhagen, I.W. and A. Kelman. 1964. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudamonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2:203-230.
10. Carmeille, A., P. Prior, H. Kodja, F. Chiroleu, J. Luisetti, and P. Besse. 2006. Evaluation of resistance to race 3, biovar 2 of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato germplasm. J Phytopath 154:398-402.
11. Cuartero, J., M.C. Bolarin, M.J. Asins, and V. Moreno. 2006. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J. Expt. Bot. 57:1045-1058.
12. Driver, J.G. and F.J. Louws. 2002. Fumigants and varieties to manage southern bacterial wilt of tomato. 2002 Ann. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, Orlando, FL, 6-8 Nov. 2002.
13. Estan, M.T., M.M. Martinez-Rodriguez, F. Perez-Alfocea, T.J. Flowers, and M.C. Bolarin. 2005. Grafting raises the salt tolerance of tomato through limiting the transport of sodium and chloride to the shoot. J. Expt. Bot. 56:703-712.
14. Fernandez-Garcia, N., V. Martinez, A. Cerda, and M. Carvajal. 2002. Water and nutrient uptake of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 159:899-905.
15. Fuchs, J.G., Y. Moenne-Loccoz, and G. Defago. 1999. Ability of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Fo47 to protect tomato against fusarium wilt. Biol. Control 14:105-110.
16. Giannakou, I.O. and D.G. Karpouzas. 2003. Evaluation of chemical and integrated strategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of root-knot nematodes in Greece. Pest Mgt. Sci. 59:883-892.
17. Grassbaugh, E., T. Harker, B. Bergefurd, and M. Bennett. 1999. Specialty and heirloom tomato production and marketing. Dept. Health and Consumer Sci.: Ohio Agr. Res. and Dev. Ctr. Bul. 684.
18. Grimault, V., G. Anais, and P. Prior. 1994. Distribution of Pseudomonas solanacearum in the stem tissues of tomato plants with different levels of resistance to bacterial wilt. Plant Pathol. 43:663-668.
19. Hayward, A.C. 1964. Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 27:203-230.
20. Jones, J.P. 1991. Fusarium wilt, p. 15. In: Jones, J.B., J.P. Jones, R.E. Stall, and T. Zitter (eds.). Compendium of tomato disease. Amer. Phytopathol. Press, St. Paul, MN.
21. Kelman, A. 1954. The relationship of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance on a tetrazolium medium. Phytopathol. 44:693-695.
22. Kelman, A. 1998. One hundred and one years of research on bacterial wilt, p. 1-6. In: Prior, P., C. Allen, and J. Elphinstone (eds.). Bacterial wilt disease: Molecular and ecological aspects. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
23. Khan, M.R. and S.M. Khan. 2002. Effects of root-dip treatment with certain phosphate solubilizing microorganisms on the fusariam wilt of tomato. Bioresour. Technol. 85:213-215.
24. Lamont, W.J., Jr., M.D. Orzolek, E.J. Holcomb, K. Demchak, E. Burkhart, L. White, and B. Dye. 2003. Production system for horticultural crops grown in the Perm State High Tunnel. HortTechnology 13:358-362.
25. Lee, J.M. 2003. Advances in vegetable grafting. Chronica Hort. 43:13-19.
26. Lee, J.M., H.J. Bang, and H.S. Ham. 1998. Grafting of vegetables. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67:1098-1104.
27. Lemaga, B., R. Kanzikwera, R. Kakuhenzire, J.J. Hakiza, and G. Maniz. 2001. The effect of crop rotation on bacterial wilt incidence and potato tuber yield. African Crop Sci. J. 9:257-266.
28. Leonardi, C. and F. Giuffrida. 2006. Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocks. European J. Hort. Sci. 71:97-101.
29. Lopez-Perez, J.A., M. Le Strange, I. Kaloshian, and A.T. Ploeg. 2006. Differential response of Mi gene-resistant tomato rootstocks to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita). Crop Prot. 25:382-388.
30. McCarter, S.M. 1991. Bacterial wilt, p. 28-29. In: Jones, J.B., J.P. Jones, R.E. Stall, and T. Zitter (eds.). Compendium of tomato diseases. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc. Press, St. Paul, MN.
31. McSorley, R. 2002. Nematode and insect management in transitional agricultural systems. HortTechnology 12:597-600.
32. Melton, T.A. and N.T. Powell. 1991. Effects of 2-year crop rotations and cultivar resistance on bacterial wilt in flue-cured tobacco. Plant Dis. 75:695-698.
33. Nakaho, K., H. Inoue, T. Takayama, and H. Miyagawa. 2004. Distribution and multiplication of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato plants with resistance derived from different origins. J Gen Plant Path. 70:115-119.
34. Oda, M. 1995. New grafting methods for fruit-bearing vegetables in Japan. Jpn. Agr. Res. Qrtly 29:187-194.
35. Oda, M. 1999. Grafting of vegetables to improve greenhouse production. 16 Feb. 2005. 〈http://www.agnet.org/library/eb/480/〉.
36. Opena, R.T., G.L. Hartman, J.T. Chen, and C.H. Yang. 1990. Breeding for bacterial wilt resistance in tropical tomato. 3rd International Conference for Plant Protection in the Tropics, Genting Highlands, Malaysia. 15-18 Mar. 1980.
37. Pavlou, G.C., D.J. Vakalounakis, and E.K. Ligoxigakis. 2002. Control of root and stem rot of cucumber, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp radicis-cucumerinum, by grafting onto resistant rootstocks. Plant Dis. 86:379-382.
38. Peregrine, W.T.H. and K. Binahmad. 1982. Grafting - A simple technique for overcoming bacterial wilt in tomato. Trop. Pest Mgt. 28:71-76.
39. Rivard, C.L. and F.J. Louws. 2006. Grafting for disease resistance in heirloom tomatoes. North Carolina Coop. Ext. Serv. Bul. Ag-675.
40. Rivero, R.M., J.M. Ruiz, and L. Romero. 2003a. Role of grafting in horticultural plants under stress conditions. Food. Agr. & Environ. 1:70-74.
41. Rivero, R.M., J.M. Ruiz, and L. Romero. 2003b. Can grafting in tomato plants strengthen resistance to thermal stress? J. Sci. of Food and Agr. 83:1315-1319.
42. Ruiz, J.M., A. Belakbir, and L. Romero. 1996. Foliar level of phosphorus and its bioindicators in Cucumis melo grafted plants. A possible effect of rootstocks. J. Plant Physiol. 149:400-404.
43. Ruiz, J.M. and L. Romero. 1999. Nitrogen efficiency and metabolism in grafted melon plants. Sci. Hort. 81:113-123.
44. Scott, J.W. 1996. Tomato improvement for bacterial disease resistance for the tropics: A contemporary basis and future prospects. 1st Intl. Symp. on Trop. Tomato Dis., Recife, Pemambuco, Brazil, 21-22 Nov. 1996.
45. Scott, J.W., J.F. Wang, and P.M. Hanson. 2005. Breeding tomatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt, a global view. I Intl. Symp. on Tomato Dis., Orlando, FL, 25 Nov. 2005.
46. Shaner, G. and R.E. Finney. 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathol. 67:1051-1056.
47. Tikoo, S.K., P.J. Mathai, and R. Kishan. 1979. Successful graft culture of tomato in bacterial wilt sick soils. Curr. Sci. 48:259-260.
48. Tresky, S. and E. Walz. 1997. Testing solutions for control of bacterial wilt in tomatoes. Organic Farming Res. Foundation Bul. 4.
49. Walter, J.M. 1967. Hereditary resistance to disease in tomato. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 5:131-162.
50. Wang, J.F., P.M. Hanson, and J.A. Barnes. 1998. Worldwide evaluation of and international set of resistance sources to bacterial wilt in tomato, p. 269-275. In: Prior, P., C. Allen, and J. Elphinstone (eds.). Bacterial wilt disease: Molecular and ecological aspects. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
51. Wittwer, S.H. and N. Castilla. 1995. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops worldwide. HortTechnology 5:6-23.
52. Yetisir, H. and N. Sari. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and quality of watermelon. Austral. J. Expt. Agr. 43:1269-1274.
53. Zinati, G.M. 2002. Transition from conventional to organic farming systems: I. Challenges, recommendations, and guidelines for pest management. HortTechnology 12:606-610.