Care ideologies reflected in 4 conceptions of pharmaceutical care

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 332-342

  Björkman, Ingeborg K ^a   Bernsten, Cecilia B ^a   Sanner, Margareta A ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Care ideology; Pharmaceutical care

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHARMACIST; PHARMACY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING SYSTEMS; DATA COLLECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES; PHARMACISTS; PROFESSIONAL ROLE;

EID: 57049163012     PISSN: 15517411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Mikeal R.L., Brown T.R., Lazarus H.L., and Vinson M.C. Quality of pharmaceutical care in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 32 6 (1975) 567-574
2. Hepler C.D., and Strand L.M. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 47 3 (1990) 533-543
3. Berardo D.H., Kimberlin C.L., McKenzie L.C., and Pendergast J.F. Community pharmacists' documentation of intervention on drug related problems of elderly patients. J Soc Adm Pharm 11 4 (1994) 182-193
4. Poirier S., and Gariepy Y. Compensation in Canada for resolving drug-related problems. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) NS36 2 (1996) 117-122
5. Caleo S., Benrimoj S., Collins D., Lauchlan R., and Stewart K. Clinical evaluation of community pharmacists' interventions. Int J Pharm Pract 4 (1996) 221-227
6. Chen T., Casson C., Krass I., and Benrimoj S. Medication regimen review process. A guide for community pharmacists. Austr Pharm 15 11 (1996) 681-685
7. Westerlund L.T., Almarsdóttir A.B., and Melander A. Drug-related problems and pharmacy interventions in community practice. Int J Pharm Pract 7 (1999) 40-50
8. Raynor D.K., Nicolson M., Nunney J., Petty D., Vail A., and Davies L. The development and evaluation of an extended adherence support programme by community pharmacists for elderly patients at home. Int J Pharm Pract 8 (2000) 157-164
9. Titley-Lake C., and Barber N. Drug-related problems in the elders of the British Virgin Islands. Int J Pharm Pract 8 (2000) 53-59
10. Krska J., Cromarty J.A., Arris F., et al. Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care. Age Ageing 30 3 (2001) 205-211
11. Gilbert A.L., Roughead E.E., Beilby J., Mott K., and Barratt J.D. Collaborative medication management services: improving patient care. Med J Aust 177 4 (2002) 189-192
12. Schaefer M. Discussing basic principles for a coding system of drug-related problems: the case of PI-Doc. Pharm World Sci 24 4 (2002) 120-127
13. PCNE website. Available at:. http://www.pcne.org Accessed 23.06.04
14. Consensus Committee. Second consensus of Granada on drug therapy problems. Ars Pharm 43 3-4 (2002) 175-184
15. Björkman I, Sanner M, Bernsten C. Comparing 4 classification systems for drug related problems: Processes and functions. Res Soc Adm Pharm, in press.
16. Cipolle R.J., Strand L.M., and Morley P.C. Pharmaceutical Care Practice (1998), McGraw-Hill, New York
17. Fernandez-Llimos F., and Faus M.J. Comment: drug-related problem classification systems. Ann Pharmacother 38 9 (2004) 1542-1543 Author reply 4-45
18. Apoteket AB. Guide-LRP i ATS (Guide-drug related problems in the Pharmacy Computer System) Feb. 2001. Copyright Apoteket AB. Apoteket AB.
19. Strand L.M., Morley P.C., Cipolle R.J., Ramsey R., and Lamsam G.D. Drug-related problems: their structure and function. DICP 24 11 (1990) 1093-1097
20. Fernandez-Llimos F., Faus M.J., Gastelurrutia M.A., Baena M.I., and Martinez Martinez F. Evolution of the concept of drug-related problems: outcomes as the focus of the new paradigm. Seguim Farmacoter 3 4 (2005) 167-188
21. Dall'Alba G. Medical practice as characterised by beginning medical students. Adv Health Sci Edu 3 (1998) 101-108
22. Björkman I.K., Bernsten C.B., Schmidt I.K., and Holmström I. The role of drug and therapeutics committees. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 18 4-5 (2005) 235-248
23. Larsson J., Holmström I., and Rosenqvist U. Professional artist, good Samaritan, servant and co-ordinator: four ways of understanding the anaesthetist's work. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47 7 (2003) 787-793
24. Dahlgren L., Emmelin M., and Winkvist A. Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health (2004), Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå
25. Strauss A., and Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory-Procedures and Techniques (1990), Sage Publ, Newbury Park
26. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268 17 (1992) 2420-2425
27. Leape L.L., Berwick D.M., and Bates D.W. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA 288 4 (2002) 501-507
28. Reilly B.M. The essence of EBM. BMJ 329 7473 (2004) 991-992
29. Davidoff F., Haynes B., Sackett D., and Smith R. Evidence based medicine. BMJ 310 6987 (1995) 1085-1086
30. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M., Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., and Richardson W.S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312 7023 (1996) 71-72
31. Malterud K. The social construction of clinical knowledge-the context of culture and discourse. Commentary on Tonelli (2006), Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. J Eval Clin Pract 12 (2006) 248-256 J Eval Clin Pract 2006;12(3):292-295
32. Wilson H.J. The myth of objectivity: is medicine moving towards a social constructivist medical paradigm?. Fam Pract 17 2 (2000) 203-209
33. Goldenberg M.J. On evidence and evidence-based medicine: lessons from the philosophy of science. Soc Sci Med 62 11 (2006) 2621-2632
34. Wilson T. Evidence based medicine: does it make a difference? Evidence base is weak and comes too late for evidence based policy making. BMJ 330 7482 (2005) 93 discussion 4
35. Rothwell P.M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet 365 9453 (2005) 82-93
36. Mead N., and Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 48 1 (2002) 51-61
37. Ong L.M., de Haes J.C., Hoos A.M., and Lammes F.B. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40 7 (1995) 903-918
38. Stewart M.A. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 152 9 (1995) 1423-1433
39. Mead N., and Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 51 7 (2000) 1087-1110
40. Roter D. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Educ Couns 39 1 (2000) 5-15
41. Bridson J., Hammond C., Leach A., and Chester M.R. Making consent patient centred. BMJ 327 7424 (2003) 1159-1161
42. Fernandez-Llimos F., Faus M.J., Gastelurrutia M.A., Baena M.I., Tuneu L., and Martinez Martínez F. Systematic identification of negative clinical outcomes from pharmacotherapy. Seguim Farmacoter 2 3 (2004) 195-205
43. Granas A.G., and Bates I. Patients' understanding and management of their illnesses and prescribed medicines-a descriptive study. Pharm World Sci 27 4 (2005) 321-328