Model-driven engineering of rules for web services

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5235 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 377-395

  Ribarić, Marko ^a   Gašević, Dragan ^b   Milanović, Milan ^c   Giurca, Adrian ^d   Lukichev, Sergey ^d   Wagner, Gerd ^d  

^a MIHAJLO PUPIN INSTITUTE   (Serbia)

^b ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^d BRANDENBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; CONCRETE INDUSTRY; MODELING LANGUAGES; PROBLEM ORIENTED LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WEBSITES;

DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS; EVENT CONDITION ACTION RULES; LOOSELY-COUPLED INTEGRATION; MESSAGE EXCHANGE PATTERNS; MODEL TRANSFORMATION; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; PROCESS-ORIENTED APPROACHES; UML ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 57049151794     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88643-3_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Ver. 2.0 Part 1: Core Language. W3C Candidate Rec, http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsd120-20070626
2. UDDI Ver. 3.0.2. OASIS v3.htm (2004), http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi
3. SOAP Ver. 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-partl/
4. Vara, J., de Castro, V., Marcos, E.: WSDL Automatic Generation from UML Models in a MDA Framework. Int. J. of Web Services Pract. 1(1-2), 1-12 (2005)
5. Manolescu, I., et al.: Model-driven design and deployment of service-enabled web applications. ACM Trans. Inter. Tech. 5(3), 439-479 (2005)
6. Sheth, A., Verma, K., Gomadam, K.: Semantics to energize the full services spectrum. Communication of the ACM 49, 55-61 (2006)
7. Charfi, A., Mezini, M.: Hybrid Web service composition: Business processes meet business rules. In: Proc. of 2nd Int'1 Conf. on Service Oriented Comp., pp. 30-38 (2004)
8. Schmidt, D.C.: Model-Driven Engineering. Computer 39(2), 25-31 (2006)
9. Bezivin, J., Hammoudi, S., Lopes, D., Jouault, F.: Applying MDA approach for Web Service Platform. In: Proc. of the 8th IEEE Int. Conf. on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conf., pp. 58-70 (2004)
10. Timm, J., Gannod, G.: A Model-Driven Approach for Specifying Semantic Web Services. In: Proc. of IEEE Int'1 Conf. on Web Services, pp. 313-320 (2005)
11. Gronmo, R., Jaeger, M.C., Hoff, H.: Transformations between UML and OWL-S. In: Proc. of the 1st European Conf. on Model Driven Architecture - Foundations and Applications, pp. 269-283 (2005)
12. McClintock, C., de Sainte Marie. C.: ILOG's position on rule languages for interoperability. In: W3C Rule Languages for Interoperability (2005)
13. Ross, R.G.: Principles of the Business Rule Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
14. RIF Use Cases and Requirements. W3C Working Draft, http://www.w3.org/TR/ rif-ucr
15. Lukichev, S., Wagner, G.: Visual rules modeling. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Perspectives of Systems Informatics, pp. 467-673 (2006)
16. Lukichev, S., Wagner, G.: UML-based rule modeling with Fujaba. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Fujaba Days 2006, pp. 31-35 (2006)
17. Coyle, F.: XML, Web Services, and the Data Revolution. Addison Wesley, Reading (2002)
18. Er1, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts. Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2005)
19. Hirtle, D., et al.: Schema Specification of RuleML 0.91 (2006), http://www.ruleml.org/spec/
20. Horrocks. I., et al.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Sub. (2004), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
21. Object Management Group: Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) - Interim Specification. OMG Document - dtc/06-03-02 (2006)
22. Object Management Group: Production Rule Representation (PRR) - revised sumbission. OMG Document - bmi/07-08-01 (2007)
23. Wagner, G., Giurca, A., Lukichev, S.: R2ML: A General Approach for Marking up Rules, In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proc. 05371 (2006)
24. Giurca, A., Lukichev, S., Wagner, G.: Modeling Web Services with URML. In: Proceedings of Workshop Semantics for Business Process Management (2006)
25. Atlas Transformation Language - User Manual, ver. 0.7, ATLAS group, Nantes, http://www.eclipse.org/gmt/atl/doc/ATL-User-Manual.v0.7.pdf
26. MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification, OMG document ptc/05-11-01 (2005). http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/05-11-01.pdf
27. Milanovic, M., Gasevic, D., Giurca, A., Wagner, G., Devedzic, V.: On interchanging between OWL/SWRL and UML/OCL. In: Proc. of the OCLApps Workshop, pp. 81-95 (2006)
28. Nagl, C., Rosenberg, F., Dustdar, S.: VIDRE-A distributed service oriented business rule engine based on RuleML. In: Proc. of the 10th IEEE Int'1 Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 35-44 (2006)
29. Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., Devedzic, V.: Bridging MDA and OWL ontologies. Journal of Web Engineering 4(2), 119-134 (2005)
30. Brambilla, M.S., et al.: Exception handling in workflow-driven web applications. In: Proc. of the 14th Int'1 WWW Conference, pp. 170-179 (2005)
31. Brown, A.W., et al.: A Practical Perspective on the Design and Implementation of Service-Oriented Solutions. In: Proc. of the 10th ACM/IEEE 10th Int'1 Conf. on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 390-404 (2007)
32. Margaria. T.: Service Is in the Eyes of the Beholder. Computer 40(11), 33-37 (2007)
33. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Systems Journal 45(3), 621-645 (2006)