RGPS: A unified requirements meta-modeling frame for networked software

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 29-35

  Wang, Jian ^a   He, Keqing ^a   Gong, Ping ^a   Wang, Chong ^a   Peng, Rong ^a   Li, Bing ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Context; Networked software; RGPS; Trustworthy

Indexed keywords

APPLICATIONS; COBALT; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CASE STUDIES; COMPLEX SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; CONTEXT; DYNAMIC TOPOLOGIES; LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS; NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS; NETWORKED SOFTWARE; NONFUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; RGPS; SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING; TRUSTWORTHY; UNIFIED REQUIREMENTS; URBAN TRANSPORTATIONS;

TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EID: 57049129801     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1370811.1370817     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Huhns, M. N., and Singh M. P. 2005. Service-oriented computing: key concepts and principles. IEEE Internet Computing. 1-2(2005), 2-8.
2. Feiler, P., Goodenough, J., Linger, R., et al. 2006. Ultra-Large-Scale Systems: The Software Challenge of the Future. Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon University, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/uls/uls.pdf
3. He, K., Peng, R., Liu, J., et al. 2006. Design methodology of Networked software evolution growth based on software patterns. Journal of System Science and Complexity, 19 (2006), 157-181.
4. Wang, J., He, K., Li, B., et al. 2007. Meta-models of Domain Modeling Framework for Networked Software. In Proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing (Urumchi, China, Aug. 2007). GCC'2007. 878-885.
5. Dey, A. K. 2001, Understanding and Using Context. Pers. and Ubiquitous Comp. J. 5, 1(2001), 4-7.
6. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J. C., Randell, B., and Landwehr, C. 2004. Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. on Dependable and Secure Computing. 1, 1(2004), 11-33.
7. Donzelli, P. and Basili, V. 2006. A practical framework for eliciting and modeling system dependability requirements: Experience from the NASA high dependability computing project. Journal of Systems and Software. 79(2006), 107-119.
8. Yu, E. 1994. Modeling strategic relationships for process reengineering. PhD thesis, Department of computer science, University of Toronto.
9. Jureta, I. and Faulkner S. 2005. An agent-oriented metamodel for enterprise modeling. In Proceedings of ER workshop 2005, LNCS 3770, 2005, 151-161.
10. Lamsweerde, A. V. 2001. Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Requirements Engineering (Toronto, Canada, Aug. 2001). RE'01.249-263.
11. Rang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., et al. 1990. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA): feasibility study. Technical Report: CMU/SEI-90-TR-021, Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon University.http://www.sei.cmu. edu.
12. Martin, D., Ankolekar, A., Burstein, M., et al. 2006. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C Candidate Recommendation, http://www.daml.org/ services/owl-s/.
13. Jackson, M. 2001. Problem Frames, ACM Press Books, Addison Wesley.
14. Jackson, M. 2005. Problem Frames and Software Engineering. Journal of Information and Software Technology, special issue on the 1 st International Workshop on Advances and Applications of Problem Frames. 47, 14(Nov. 2005), 903-912.
15. Laney, R., Barroca, L., Jackson, M., et al. 2004. Composing Requirements Using Problem Frames. In Proceedings of the 12th International Requirements Engineering Conference, (Kyoto, Japan, 2004). RE'04. 122-131.
16. Woodcock, J. and Davies, J. 1996. Using Z: Specification, Refinement, and Proof. Prentice-Hall International.