How do Spanish firms innovate? An empirical evidence;¿Cómo innovan las empresas españolas? Una evidencia empírica

Journal of Technology Management and Innovation

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 100-111

  Vega Jurado, Jaider ^a   Gutiérrez Gracia, Antonio ^a   Fernández de Lucio, Ignacio ^a  

^a INGENIO CSIC UPV Technical University of Valencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

External knowledge sourcing; In house R D; Innovative performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049127007     PISSN: None     EISSN: 07182724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ACS, Z.J., & Audretsch, D.B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review 78, 678-690
2. BAPTISTA, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in cluster innovate more?. Research Policy 27, 525-540.
3. BAYONA, C., García, T., & Huerta, E. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management, 32, 321-341.
4. BENEITO, P. (2003).Choosing among alternative technological strategies:An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation. Research Policy, 32, 693-713.
5. BÖNTE, W. (2003). R&D and productivity: Internal vs external R&D - evidence from West German manufacturing industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12, 343-360.
6. BRESCHI, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral systems of innovation. In Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter.
7. CASTRO, E., & Fernández, I. (2006). La I+D empresarial y sus relaciones con la investigación pública española, in: Sebastián, J., Muñoz, E. (Eds.), Radiografia de la investigación pública en España. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, pp. 349-372.
8. CALOGHIROU, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24, 29-39.
9. CASSIMAN, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52, 68-82.
10. COHEN, W. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In Stoneman, P. (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwel.
11. COOMBS, R. (1996). Core competences and the strategic management of R&D. R&D Management, 26, 345-355.
12. COOKE P., & Morgan, K. (1998). The creative milieu: a regional perspective on innovation. In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 25-32.
13. EVANGELISTA, R. (1999). Knowledge and investment. The sources of innovation in industry, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. FREEL, M. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy 32, 751-770.
15. GREENE, W.H. (1993). Econometric Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
16. HAAS, M., & Hansen, M., (2005). When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1-24.
17. HAGEDOORN, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-385.
18. HOWELLS, J. (1999). Regional systems of innovation?. In: Archibugi, D., Howells, J., Michie, J. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. KAMIEN, M., & Schwartz, N. (1982). Market structure and innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. LUNDVALL, B-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation:Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
21. MACPHERSON.A.D. (1997).A comparison of within-firm and external sources of product innovation. Growth and Change, 28, 289-308.
22. MAIRESSE, J., & Mohnen, P. (2005). The importance of R&D for innovation: a reassessment using French survey data. Journal of Technology Transfer 30, (1-2), 183-197.
23. MANNING, W.G, Duan, N., & Rogers, W.H., (1987). Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models. Journal of Econometrics, 35, 59-82.
24. MARCH, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organization Science 2, 71-87.
25. MIOTTI, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy 32, 1481-1499.
26. NARULA, R. (2001). Choosing between internal and non-internal R&D activities: some technological and economic factors. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 13, (3), 365-387.
27. NELSON, R. (2000). National innovation systems. In Acs, Z., (Ed.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. London: Pinter, pp. 11-26.
28. OERLEMANS, L., Meeus, M., & Boekema, F. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 89, 298-309.
29. PAVITT, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change. Research Policy 13, 343-373.
30. REICHSTEIN, T, & Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 15, 653-682.
31. STERNBERG, R. (2000). Innovation networks and regional development - evidence from European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS): theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. European Planning Studies 8, 389-407.
32. TEECE, D. (1992). Competition, cooperation and innovation. Journal of Economic behaviour and Organization 18, 1-25.
33. VEGA-JURADO, J., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The affect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation. Research Policy 37, 616-632.
34. VEUGELERS, R., & Cassiman B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28 63-80.
35. VON HIPPEL, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.