-
1
-
-
84905541716
-
Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?
-
Harrison-Woolrych M., Ashton J., and Coulter D. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?. Contraception 67 (2003) 53-56
-
(2003)
Contraception
, vol.67
, pp. 53-56
-
-
Harrison-Woolrych, M.1
Ashton, J.2
Coulter, D.3
-
3
-
-
0031842607
-
Perforations with intrauterine devices: report from a Swedish survey
-
Andersson K., Ryde-Blomquist E., Lindell K., Odlind V., and Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices: report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 57 (1998) 251-255
-
(1998)
Contraception
, vol.57
, pp. 251-255
-
-
Andersson, K.1
Ryde-Blomquist, E.2
Lindell, K.3
Odlind, V.4
Milsom, I.5
-
4
-
-
0027751571
-
Sonographic diagnosis of bladder perforation by an intrauterine device: a case report
-
Sepulveda W.H., Ciuffardi I., Olivari A., and Gallegos O. Sonographic diagnosis of bladder perforation by an intrauterine device: a case report. J. Reprod Med 38 (1993) 911-913
-
(1993)
J. Reprod Med
, vol.38
, pp. 911-913
-
-
Sepulveda, W.H.1
Ciuffardi, I.2
Olivari, A.3
Gallegos, O.4
-
7
-
-
57049102652
-
-
Dean G, Goldberg A. The intrauterine contraceptive device 2004. Available at http://www.uptodate.com [accessed 7 August 2006].
-
Dean G, Goldberg A. The intrauterine contraceptive device 2004. Available at http://www.uptodate.com [accessed 7 August 2006].
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
0019777893
-
Appendiceal perforation by Copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device
-
Carson S., Gatlin A., and Mazur M. Appendiceal perforation by Copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141 (1981) 586-587
-
(1981)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.141
, pp. 586-587
-
-
Carson, S.1
Gatlin, A.2
Mazur, M.3
-
9
-
-
19744364925
-
Asymptomatic cervical perforation by intrauterine copper bearing contraceptive device: two unusual cases
-
Savardekar L., Shah R.S., and Vandana W. Asymptomatic cervical perforation by intrauterine copper bearing contraceptive device: two unusual cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120 (2005) 236-237
-
(2005)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
, vol.120
, pp. 236-237
-
-
Savardekar, L.1
Shah, R.S.2
Vandana, W.3
-
10
-
-
0036669832
-
Extrauterine mislocated IUCD: is surgical removal mandatory?
-
Markovitch O., Klein Z., Gidoni Y., Holzinger M., and Beyth Y. Extrauterine mislocated IUCD: is surgical removal mandatory?. Contraception 66 (2002) 105-108
-
(2002)
Contraception
, vol.66
, pp. 105-108
-
-
Markovitch, O.1
Klein, Z.2
Gidoni, Y.3
Holzinger, M.4
Beyth, Y.5
-
11
-
-
0018865042
-
Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine devices
-
Key T.C., and Kreutner A.K. Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 55 (1980) 239-244
-
(1980)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.55
, pp. 239-244
-
-
Key, T.C.1
Kreutner, A.K.2
-
12
-
-
33644849491
-
Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report and review of the literature
-
Chi E., Rosenfeld D., and Sokol T. Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report and review of the literature. Am Surg 71 (2005) 1055-1057
-
(2005)
Am Surg
, vol.71
, pp. 1055-1057
-
-
Chi, E.1
Rosenfeld, D.2
Sokol, T.3
-
13
-
-
17644373406
-
Symptomatic cecal perforation by an intrauterine device with appendectomy removal
-
Stuckey A., Dutreil P., Aspuru E., and Nolan T.E. Symptomatic cecal perforation by an intrauterine device with appendectomy removal. Obstet Gynecol 105 (2005) 1239-1241
-
(2005)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.105
, pp. 1239-1241
-
-
Stuckey, A.1
Dutreil, P.2
Aspuru, E.3
Nolan, T.E.4
|