Dominance-based rough set approach to interactive multiobjective optimization

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5252 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 121-155

  Greco, Salvatore ^a   Matarazzo, Benedetto ^a   Słowiński, Roman ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^b POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ITERATIVE METHODS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ROUGH SET THEORY;

DECISION MAKERS; DOMINANCE-BASED ROUGH SET APPROACH; DOMINANCE-BASED ROUGH SET APPROACH (DRSA); INTERACTIVE MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PARETO-OPTIMAL SETS; PREFERENCE MODELING; SATISFACTORY SOLUTIONS;

PARETO PRINCIPLE;

EID: 57049106380     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: PROMETHEE methods. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 163-195. Springer, Berlin (2005)
2. Chankong, V., Haimes, Y.Y.: The interactive surrogate worth trade-off (iswt) method for multiobjective decision-making. In: Zionts, S. (ed.) Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, pp. 42-67. Springer, Berlin (1978)
3. Chankong, V., Haimes, Y.Y.: Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsiever Science Publishing Co., New York (1983)
4. Dyer, J.S.: MAUT-multiattribute utility theory. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 265-295. Springer, Berlin (2005)
5. Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., Roy, B.: ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 265-295. Springer, Berlin (2005a)
6. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, Berlin (2005b)
7. Fishburn, P.C.: Methods of estimating additive utilities. Management Science 13(7), 435-453 (1967)
8. Geoffrion, A., Dyer, J., Feinberg, A.: An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science 19(4), 357-368 (1972)
9. Giove, S., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Variable consistency monotonic decision trees. In: Alpigini, J.J., Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Zhong, N. (eds.) RSCTC 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2475, pp. 247-254. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
10. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. European J. Operational Research 117, 63-83 (1999a)
11. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM. In: Gal, T., Stewart, T., Hanne, T. (eds.) Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 14.1-14.59, Kluwer, Boston (1999b)
12. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R., Stefanowski, J.: An algorithm for induction of decision rules consistent with the dominance principle. In: Ziarko, W., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSCTC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2005, pp. 304-313. Springer, Heidelberg (2001a)
13. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European J. of Operational Research 129, 1-47 (2001b)
14. Greco, S., Słlowński, R., Stefanowski, J.: Mining association rules in preference-ordered data. In: Hacid, M.-S., Raś, Z.W., Zighed, A.D.A., Kodratoff, Y. (eds.) ISMIS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2366, pp. 442-450. Springer, Heidelberg (2002a)
15. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Preference representation by means of conjoint measurement & decision rule model. In: Bouyssou, D., et al. (eds.) Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria-Essays in Honor of Bernard Roy, pp. 263-313. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002b)
16. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and roughset decision rules. European J. of Operational Research 158, 271-292 (2004a)
17. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R.: Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17, 345-361 (2004b)
18. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Dominance-based rough set approach to knowledge discovery - (I) general perspective, (II) extensions and applications. In: Zhong, N., Liu, J. (eds.) Intelligent Technologies for Information Analysis, pp. 513-612. Springer, Berlin (2004c)
19. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Decision rule approach. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 507-563. Springer, Berlin (2005a)
20. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Ałowiński, R.: Generalizing rough set theory through dominance-based rough set approach. In: Ślȩ zak, D., Yao, J., Peters, J.F., Ziarko, W., Hu, X. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3642, pp. 1-11. Springer, Heidelberg (2005b)
21. Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Ałowiński, R.: Ordinal regression revisted: Multiple criteria ranking with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research 191, 415-435 (2008)
22. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. European J. of Operational Research 10, 151-164 (1982)
23. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Meziani, R., Słowiński, R.: MOLP with an interactive assessment of a piecewise linear utility function. European J. of Operational Research 31, 350-357 (1987)
24. Jaszkiewicz, A., Ferhat, A.B.: Solving multiple criteria choice problems by interactive trichotomy segementation. European Journal of Operational Research 113, 271-280 (1999)
25. Jaszkiewicz, A., Słowiński, R.: The "Light Beam Search" approach - an overview of methodology and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 113, 300-314 (1999)
26. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1976)
27. March, J.G.: Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9, 587-608 (1978)
28. Martel, J.M., Matarazzo, B.: Other outranking approaches. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 197-262. Springer, Berlin (2005)
29. Michalski, R.S., Bratko, I., Kubat, M. (eds.): Machine learning and datamining - Methods and applications. Wiley, New York (1998)
30. Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits in our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63, 81-97 (1956)
31. Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization 12, 157-174 (1998)
32. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341-356 (1982)
33. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)
34. Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R.: Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis. European J. of Operational Research 72, 443-459 (1994)
35. Roberts, F.: Measurement Theory, with Applications to Decision Making, Utility and the Social Sciences. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1979)
36. Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Económica, Paris (1993)
37. Słowiński, R.: Rough set learning of preferential attitude in multi-criteria decision making. In: Komorowski, J., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 1993. LNCS, vol. 689, pp. 642-651. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
38. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Axiomatization of utility, outranking and decision-rule preference models for multiple-criteria classification problems under partial inconsistency with the dominance principle. Control and Cybernetics 31, 1005-1035 (2002a)
39. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough set analysis of preference-ordered data. In: Alpigini, J.J., Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Zhong, N. (eds.) RSCTC 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2475, pp. 44-59. Springer, Heidelberg (2002b)
40. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough set based decision support. In: Burke, E.K., Kendall, G. (eds.) Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, pp. 475-527. Springer, New York (2005)
41. Stefanowski, J.: On rough set based approaches to induction of decision rules. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Sets in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 1, pp. 500-529. Physica, Heidelberg (1998)
42. Steuer, R.E., Choo, E.-U.: An interactive weighted tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Mathematical Programming 26, 326-344 (1983)
43. Wierzbicki, A.P.: The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Theory and Applications. LNEMS, vol. 177, pp. 468-486. Springer, Berlin (1980)
44. Wierzbicki, A.P.: A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making. Mathematical Modelling 3, 391-405 (1982)
45. Wierzbicki, A.P.: On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spektrum 8, 73-87 (1986)
46. Zionts, S., Wallenius, J.: An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science 22, 652-663 (1976)
47. Zionts, S., Wallenius, J.: An interactive multiple objective linear programming method for a class of underlying nonlinear utility functions. Management Science 29, 519-523 (1983)