Development of a modified in vitro skin absorption method to study the epidermal/dermal disposition of a contact allergen in human skin

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 283-294

  Pendlington, Ruth U ^a   Minter, Helen J ^a   Stupart, Leanne ^b   MacKay, Cameron ^a   Roper, Clive S ^b   Sanders, David J ^a   Pease, Camilla K ^a  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cinnamic aldehyde; Human skin penetration; In vitro alternatives; Skin allergen

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CONTACT ALLERGEN; COSMETIC; PROPYLENE GLYCOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; EPIDERMIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; KINETICS; SKIN ABSORPTION; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN PENETRATION; SKIN PERMEABILITY; SKIN STRUCTURE; STRATUM CORNEUM;

ACETONE; ACROLEIN; ADULT; ALLERGENS; ETHANOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PLANT OILS; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; SKIN; SKIN ABSORPTION; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 57049099806     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15569520802327005     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Fentem J, Carmichael P, Maxwell G, Pease CK, Reynolds F, Warner G, Westmoreland C. Exploring new approaches to assess animal safety without animal testing, Proceedings of the World Congress on Alternatives Japan, 2008.
2. EU Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union 2003; L66:26-35.
3. Fentem J, Chamberlain M, Sangster B. The feasibility of replacing animal testing for assessing consumer safety: a suggested future direction. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) 2004; 32:617-623.
4. Jowsey IR, Basketter DA, Westmoreland C, Kimber I. A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal. J Appl Toxicol 2006; 26:341-350.
5. Basketter D, Pease C, Kasting G, Kimber I, Casati S, Cronin M, DiembeckW, Gerberick F, Hadgraft J, Hartung T, Marty JP, Nikolaidis E, Patlewicz G, Roberts DW, Roggen E, Rovida C, van de Sandt J. Skin sensitisation and epidermal disposition: the relevance of epidermal disposition for sensitisation hazard identification and risk assessment. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) 2007; 35:137-154.
6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guideline for testing chemicals, Guideline 428: Skin absorption: in vitro method; Paris, France: OECD. 2004.
7. Basketter DA, Clapp C, Jefferies D, Safford B, Ryan CA, Gerberick F, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Predictive identification of human skin sensitisation thresholds. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53:260-267.
8. Smith CK, Moore C, Elahi E, Smart A, Hotchkiss SAM. Human skin absorption and metabolism of the contact allergens cinnamic aldehyde and cinnamic alcohol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000; 168:189-199.
9. Felter S, Robinson M, Basketter DA, Gerberick F. A review of the scientific basis of uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47:257-266.