The development dimension of imf lending policies

International Spectator

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 95-113

  Lombardi, Domenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049089715     PISSN: 03932729     EISSN: 17519721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03932720601160450     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baldacci, E., B. Clements, S. Gupta and Q. Cui. Social Spending, Human Capital, and Growth in Developing Countries: Implications for Achieving the MDGs. IMF Working Paper 04/217. Washington, DC: IMF, 2004.
2. Bergsten, F. “Reform of the International Monetary Fund”. Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on International Trade and Finance, Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Washington, DC: US Senate, 2006.
3. Bevan, D. “The IMF and Low-Income Countries”. World Economics, 6, no. 2 (2005): 67-85.
4. Bevan, D. And C. Adam. “Poverty Reduction Strategies and the Macroeconomic Policy Framework”. Paper prepared for the Department for International Development, London, 2001.
5. Bird, G. “The IMF and Poor Countries: Towards a More Fulfilling Relationship”. Unpublished paper. University of Surrey, 2004.
6. Bird, G. And D. Rowlands. “Do IMF Programmes have a Catalytic Effect on Other International Capital Flows?” Oxford Development Studies, 30, no. 3 (2002): 229-49.
7. Boughton, J. “Does the World Need a Universal Financial Institution?” World Economics, 6, no. 2 (2005): 27-46.
8. Boughton, J. The Silent Revolution. Washington, DC: IMF, 2001.
9. Boughton, J. And A. Mourmouras. Is Policy Ownership an Operational Concept?? IMF Working Paper 02/72. Washington, DC: IMF, 2002.
10. Bulir, A. Income Inequality: Does Inflation Matter? IMF Working Paper 98/7. Washington, DC: IMF, 1998.
11. Cashin, P., P. Mauro, C. Pattillo and R. Sahay. Macroeconomic Policies and Poverty Reduction: Stylized Facts and Overview of Research. IMF Working Paper 01/135. Washington, DC: IMF, 2001.
12. Dollar, D. And A. Kraay. “Growth Is Good for the Poor”. Journal of Economic Growth, 7 (2002): 195-225.
13. Epaulard, A. Macroeconomic Performance and Poverty Reduction. IMF Working Paper 03/72. Washington, DC: IMF, 2003.
14. Glennerster, R. And Y. Shin. Is Transparency Good for You, and Can the IMF Help?? IMF Working Paper 03/132. Washington, DC: IMF, 2003.
15. Goldstein, M. “IMF Structural Conditionality: How Much Is Too Much?” Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 2000.
16. Hakura, D. And S. Nsouli. The Millennium Development Goals, the Emerging Framework for Capacity-building, and the Role oftheTMF. IMF Working Paper 03/119. Washington, DC: IMF, 2003.
17. IMF. External Evaluation of the ESAF, Report by a Group of Independent Experts. Washington, DC: IMF, 1998.
18. IMF. Is the PRGF Living Up to Expectations?? An Assessment of Program Design. IMF Occasional Paper 216. Washington, DC: IMF, 2002.
19. IMF. “Key Features of IMF PRGF-Supported Programs”. Washington, DC: IMF, 2000.
20. IMF. Policy Support and Signaling in Low-Income Countries. Washington, DC: IMF, 2005.
21. IMF. Review of PRGF Program Design- Overview. Washington, DC: IMF, 2005.
22. IMF. Review of the 2002 Conditionality Guidelines. Washington, DC: IMF, 2005.
23. IMF. “Strengthening Country Ownership of Fund-Supported Programs”. Washington, DC: IMF, 2001.
24. IMF. The Managing Director’s Report on the Fund’s Medium-Term Strategy. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2005.
25. IMF. The Role of the Fund in Low-Income Countries over the Medium Term. Issue Paper for Discussion. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2004.
26. Independent Evaluation Office. Evaluation of Prolonged Use of IMF Resources. Washington, DC: IMF, 2002.
27. International Financial Institution Advisory Commission, Final Report. Washington, DC: US Congress, 2000.
28. Ivanova, A., W. Mayer, A. Mourmouras and G. Anayiotos. What Determines the Implementation of IMF-Supported Programs? IMF Working Paper 03/8. Washington, DC: IMF, 2003.
29. Kaminsky, G. And S. Schmukler. “What Triggers Market Jitters? A Chronicle of the Asian Crisis”. Journal of International Money and Finance, 18 (1999): 537-60.
30. Killick, T., R. Gunatilaka and A. Marr. Aid and the Political Economy of Policy Change. London: Routledge, 1998.
31. Lombardi, D. And N. Woods. “The Political Economy of IMF Surveillance”. Unpublished paper. University of Oxford, 2007.
32. Lopes, P. A Comparative Analysis of Government Social Spending Indicators and Their Correlation with Social Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Working Paper 02/176. Washington, DC: IMF, 2002.
33. Mody, A. And D. Saravia. Catalyzing Private Capital Flows: Do IMF-Supported Programs Work as Commitment Devices? Working Paper 03/100. Washington, DC: IMF, 2003.
34. ODC (Overseas Development Council). The Future Role of the IMF in Development. Washington, DC: ODC, 2000.
35. Rodrik, D. TFPG Controversies, Institutions, and Economic Performance in East Asia. NBER Working Paper 5914. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
36. Rodrik, D. Why Is There Multilateral Lending?? NBER Working Paper no. 5160. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1995.
37. Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian and F. Trebbi. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. NBER Working Paper 9305. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.
38. Romer, C. And D. Romer. Monetary Policy and the Well-Being of the Poor. NBER Working Paper 6793. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1998.
39. Sachs, J. “The Millennium Development Goals”, informal seminar for IMF executive directors. Washington, DC: IMF, 2003.
40. Wood, A. And M. Lockwood. The “Perestroika of Aid??”: New Perspectives on Conditionality. London: Bretton Woods Project, 1999.