The virtual midas touch: Helping behavior after a mediated social touch

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 3507-3512

  Haans, Antal ^a   Ijsselsteijn, Wijnand A ^a   Graus, Mark P ^a   Salminen, Juho A ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Assistance (social behavior); Computer mediated communication; Haptic feedback; Mediated social touch; Physical contact

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; THEOREM PROVING;

ASSISTANCE (SOCIAL BEHAVIOR); COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; HAPTIC FEEDBACK; MEDIATED SOCIAL TOUCH; PHYSICAL CONTACT;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 57049088565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1358628.1358882     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bonanni, L., Vaucelle, C., Lieberman, J. and Zuckerman, O. TapTap: A haptic wearable for asynchronous distributed touch therapy. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 580-585.
2. Crusco, A.H. and Wetzel, C.G. The Midas touch: The effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10 (1984), 512-517.
3. Goldman, M., Kiyohara, O. and Pfannensteil, D.A. Interpersonal touch, social labeling, and the foot-in-the-door effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, (1985) 143-147.
4. Guéguen, N. Status, apparel and touch: Their joint effects on compliance to a request. North American Journal of Psychology, 4 (2002), 279-286.
5. Guéguen, N. Touch, awareness of touch, and compliance with a request. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95 (2002), 355-360.
6. Guéguen, N. and Fischer-Lokou, J. Another evaluation of touch and helping behavior. Psychological Reports, 92 (2003), 62-64.
7. Guéguen, N. and Fischer-Lokou, J. Tactile contact and spontaneous help: An evaluation in a natural setting. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (2003), 785-787.
8. Haans, A. and IJsselsteijn, W.A. Mediated social touch: A review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality, 9 (2006), 149-159.
9. Haans, A., de Nood, C. and IJsselsteijn, W.A. Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: A first test. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 2405-1410.
10. IJsselsteijn, W.A. Presence in Depth. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2005.
11. Kleinke, C.L. Compliance to a request made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (1977), 218-223.
12. Lewis, R.J., Derlega, V.J., Shankar, A., Cochard, E. and Finkel, L. Nonverbal correlates of confederates' touch: Confounds in touch research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12 (1997), 821-830.
13. Patterson, M.L., Powell, J.L. and Lenihan, M.G. Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10 (1986), 41-50.
14. Powell, J.L., Meil, W., Patterson, M.L., Chouinard, E.F., Collins, B., Kobus, TJ., Habermeir, W. and Arnone, W.L. Effects of timing of touch on compliance to a request. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9 (1994), 153-162.
15. Rovers, A.F. and van Essen, H.A. Guidelines for haptic interpersonal communication applications: An exploration of foot interaction styles. Virtual Reality, 9 (2006), 177-191.
16. Rovers, A.F. and van Essen, H.A. HIM: A framework for haptic instant messaging. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1313-1316.