Study on the methodology for evaluating urban and regional disaster carrying capacity and its application

Safety Science

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 50-58

  Chen, Guo hua ^a   Tao, Liang ^a   Zhang, Hua wen ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

City; DCC; Evaluation index system; Evaluation model; Region; Sudden accidents and disasters

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; DISASTERS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

CITY; EVALUATION INDEX SYSTEM; EVALUATION MODELING; REGION; SUDDEN ACCIDENTS AND DISASTERS;

DISASTER PREVENTION;

ARTICLE; DISASTER PLANNING; EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESCUE PERSONNEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; URBAN AREA;

EID: 56949107912     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Byun D.H. The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model [J]. Information & Management 38 (2001) 289-297
2. Chen G.H., Zhang X.M., Zhang H., et al. Performance Assessment of Emergency Planning based on Fuzzy Theories[A]. Huang P. ISSST[C] (2006), Science Press, Beijing pp. 489-493
3. Dong Y.C., et al. A comparative study of the numerical scales and prioritization methods in AHP [J]. European Journal of Operational Research 186 (2008) 229-242
4. Fiedrich F., and Gehbauer F. Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters [J]. Safety Science 35 (2000) 41-57
5. Guo Z.L., and Liu M.G. Secondary fuzzy comprehensive evaluation about the ability of a city's undertaker disaster by AHM [J]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Architectural Science and Technology 20 2 (2003) 5-8 (in Chinese)
6. How S.S., and Tom R. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modeling for marine systems [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 73 (2001) 19-34
7. Huang D.J., and Wu Z.Z. Comprehensive Assessment of Emergency Management Capacity to Urban Major Accidents [A]. WANG, Y.J., ISSST[C] (2004), Science Press, Beijing pp. 2641-2646
8. Jeremy L., and Helen S. Performance Indicators for the Assessment of Emergency Preparedness in Major Accident Hazards [R] (1995), Health & Safety Executive, UK
9. Jiao Y.Y., and Yu C.X. A study on the enterprise's information literacy and its evaluation methods [J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service 2005 3 (2005) 70-76 (in Chinese)
10. Jin L. Appearance development analysis and quantification for safety and disaster reduction strategy. China Population [J], Resources and Environment 4 3 (1994) 74-79 (in Chinese)
11. Kevin F.J., and Schmidt A.M. Emergency response training: strategies for enhancing real-world performance [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials 75 (2000) 195-215
12. Li S.C. Deepening the theoretical research of urban and region [J]. Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College 5 2 (2007) 48-52 (in Chinese)
13. Li R.P., and Li J.L. Research on appraising methods of technological innovating ability of industries [J]. Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology 24 1 (2003) 13-17 (in Chinese)
14. Lin H., and Shi P.J. Actuality and development trend of current science and technology of disaster reduction in the world [J]. Advance in Earth Sciences 9 6 (1994) 41-48 (in Chinese)
15. Liu Y.J., Mao S.J., Yao J.M., et al. Comprehensive safety evaluation of coal mine based on analytic hierarchy process [J]. Mining Research and Development 27 4 (2007) 82-84 (in Chinese)
16. Malcolm B. An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales with AHP [J]. European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 104-117
17. Miller G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information [J]. Psychological Review 63 2 (1956) 81-97
18. Omasa T., et al. An attempt at decision making in tissue engineering: reactor evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal 20 (2004) 173-179
19. Saaty T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures [J]. Journal of mathematical psychology 15 (1977) 234-281
20. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M] (1980), McGraw-Hill, NY pp. 13-16
21. Segall R.S. Some quantitative methods for determining capacities and locations of military emergency medical facilities [J]. Applied Mathematical Modeling 24 (2004) 365-389
22. Vargas L.G. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications [J]. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990) 2-8
23. Wang S.Y., and Feng B.X. Emergency and Management of Urban Disasters 1 (2005), Chongqing Press, Chongqing (pp. 57-58, in Chinese)
24. Wang L., and Pang H. Methods of choosing indices in comprehensive evaluation [J]. Statistics and Decision 1 (2007) 58-59 (in Chinese)
25. Wu S.M., Fu J., and Yang S.S. The structure of the system of R&D offices Comprehensive capability's evaluation index [J]. Journal of Information Engineering University 6 4 (2005) 96-98 (in Chinese)
26. Xu Z.S., and Feng K. Study on Urban Community Safety Plan and Disaster Emergency Management [A]. Wang, Y.J. ISSST[C] (2004), Science Press, Beijing pp. 2988-2992
27. Yi L.X. Index system design for urban fire risk assessment [J]. Joural of Catastrophology 4 (2000) 90-94 (in Chinese)
28. Yusuff R.M., Yee K.P., and Hashmi M.S.J. A preliminary study on the potential use of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation [J]. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing 17 5 (2001) 421-427
29. Zhang F.H., and Xie L.L. Study on evaluation of cities' ability reduction earthquake disasters [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica 26 3 (2004) 318-329 (in Chinese)
30. Zhou W., and Ma S.H. Adaptability study based on barrel theory about highway transportation and economics [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport 16 3 (2003) 77-82 (in Chinese)